I'm holding all my blood inside this skin
Apr. 1st, 2004 11:28 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Greetings to all!
I have a question.
Seems that almost every multiple I know has at one time or another dealt with a self-destructive system member that cuts, or engages in activities that are similarly dangerous to the body. The multiples I know have all been involved in trauma's of some sort (the most interesting one had for a father one of Fidel Castro's ex-bodyguards - serious freakiness there, but I digress).
Since interacting with this community, I have been introduced to the phenomenon of natural multiples, which makes sense to me and, I think, addresses some of the unanswered questions about why many horribly abused kids don't develop DID but use other coping mechanisms. I don't really want this to turn into a big discussion about the natural vs. trauma thing, but I am curious...
How many systems here deal or have dealt with self-destructive members and do you think is this an experience more closely linked with trauma-involved multiples or is it a trait shared equally across the full spectrum of all multiples? +edit: Or, do you think self-harm and multiplicity have no intrinsic connection, given the number of singlets who also engage in self-harming activities.
All comments and experiences would be greatly appreciated.
Sending good vibes to all!
Jess
I have a question.
Seems that almost every multiple I know has at one time or another dealt with a self-destructive system member that cuts, or engages in activities that are similarly dangerous to the body. The multiples I know have all been involved in trauma's of some sort (the most interesting one had for a father one of Fidel Castro's ex-bodyguards - serious freakiness there, but I digress).
Since interacting with this community, I have been introduced to the phenomenon of natural multiples, which makes sense to me and, I think, addresses some of the unanswered questions about why many horribly abused kids don't develop DID but use other coping mechanisms. I don't really want this to turn into a big discussion about the natural vs. trauma thing, but I am curious...
How many systems here deal or have dealt with self-destructive members and do you think is this an experience more closely linked with trauma-involved multiples or is it a trait shared equally across the full spectrum of all multiples? +edit: Or, do you think self-harm and multiplicity have no intrinsic connection, given the number of singlets who also engage in self-harming activities.
All comments and experiences would be greatly appreciated.
Sending good vibes to all!
Jess
no subject
Whether MPD or DID, it is usually the case to have at least one alter that is angry with the core. Alters have suffered through everything. Thier lack of trust and security with the core is usually very strong and has to be worked on.. Alters can act in dangerous behaviors(sexually,drugs, alcohol) and can also revert to SIB(Self Injur. Behav.). Most multiples stem from some for of trauma. It is rare to have multiples w/o trauma.
S.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 10:46 pm (UTC)You may want to read this if you think that's always the case: Layman's Guide (http://www.kitsune.cx/blackbirds/layman/)
Trauma-based systems (or systems which have experienced trauma) have received the most attention in psychiatric literature because smoothly-functioning systems generally had no need to see therapists-- it was a classic skewed sampling. It was like how in the 1950s therapists assumed homosexuality was always an illness because all the homosexuals who came to them seeking help were experiencing some form of emotional distress, so they assumed that distress was intrinsically connected to the experience of being gay.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 11:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 10:39 am (UTC)On the other hand; multiples, especially ones with cooperative operation of their system, have assets that would make them less likely to harm themselves than singles. You have people who can prevent the person who would harm them from taking control of the body. You have the very fact that the person can not hurt themselves without hurting everyone else. You have a support system there for helping the person.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 10:42 pm (UTC)If you really want my opinion, I think self-mutilating, especially cutting, is actually often a meme-- an idiom of distress among young women in particular. We have actually known people who never self-mutilated at all until they were in psychiatric wards with other people who did, found online support communities where other people talked about doing it, or just met other people who did it, and then became addicted to it as a release from pain, and then begged for support outside those communities asking someone to help them to stop it.
I don't think it has to do with multiplicity per se; rather I think this pattern of behaviour is expressed most often in people in general who have some kind of trauma backgrounds, whether they are multiple or not. Because so many of the multiples posting online do have trauma backgrounds (whether or not the trauma was the origin of the system), or system members with some kind of emotional issues, they're much more likely to have found the SI meme to be an outlet for their emotional distress. This isn't to say there aren't people who start doing SI of their own accord before knowing that others do, and are downright relieved to find out they're not the only ones who do it-- but there are also a lot of people we know who never started until they heard of others who did.
That said, this isn't a slam against you, but I get a little prickly whenever it's implied that it's 'normal' for multiple systems to have members who do SI. Remembering the person I knew who begged for someone to help her stop cutting, I kind of cringe at the idea that such a person might come in a multiple community looking for help and simply be told that it was normal for multiples.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 10:55 pm (UTC)"Remembering the person I knew who begged for someone to help her stop cutting, I kind of cringe at the idea that such a person might come in a multiple community looking for help and simply be told that it was normal for multiples."
I cringe at this scenario also - thus the question.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 11:09 pm (UTC)It was part of the badge of membership in communities like alt.sexual.abuse.recovery, which had a heavy multiple membership, and alt.support.dissociation, which was a spinoff of a.s.a.r. devoted entirely to multiplicity. Or should I say MPD and DID. I'm not saying that these women didn't have anything really wrong, I'm saying that they did, and the self-harming was their way of signalling that something was wrong -- I often felt it meant they were frustrated, that despite spending many hours a week in therapy, their "T's" weren't getting it or listening to them.
I think it is sometimes a way of letting off steam when nobody is hearing you -- I've seen perfectly normal toddlers bite themselves out of rage that they couldn't express themselves in words in a way their parents understood.
I also know that cutting has become fashionable and stylish among Goths or those who consider themselves same. For some it is related to blood games which are a form of vampire play. And messing around with mediaeval torture devices and the like. Were they all traumatised as children? Perhaps.
The difficulty with judging any of this by whether or not people were traumatised as children is that most people have experienced some form of trauma in childhood. Life is still cruel and brutal, even with parents who try to be kind and give their kids a good life. Andy has a rant (http://www.astraeasweb.net/plural/ourtruth.html) on our web pages about sustaining trauma in daily life. If trauma caused people to split, everybody would be multiple.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 11:09 pm (UTC)try this....
get a dull blade and 'cut' yourself with it.... one that mearly is sharp enugh to leave scratch marks at the most... lol... and just draw it over you a lot...... enugh you can feel it.....
the kinda rituatilstic mocking of self cutting can relax those urges quite a bit.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 11:11 pm (UTC)If you feel like breaking glass when you're uptight, freeze water in a tray and break it. It feels very realistic.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Agreed
Date: 2004-04-02 12:13 am (UTC)Demitri
Re: Agreed
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-01 11:26 pm (UTC)I feel it is important to clarify one thing. Forgive me if I am misunderstanding..we are having a brutal night..but I noticed someone say self-injury was a meme for young women. We were hospitalized at age sixteen for a very dramatic self injuring episode. The member of our system who did it, Blue Morpho, had no idea that anyone else in the world had ever done such a thing, nor had she ever heard of it before. The idea occured to her, you might say, out of the blue. What Blue Morpho did, in such an automatic, zombieish way, was later taken up by Roman as a learned behavior to bring emotional release, but most of all as a sort of trump card, to frighten a world that frightened and sickened her. She knew most people found it to be a deeply disturbing, even viscerally repellant, behavior. That newfound ability to repell made her feel safe.
Roman has..barely..sworn off such behaviors. She has been severely tested in this regard, and has learned that the price one pays is that there are times when one must simply writhe like a worm and feel horrible feelings. There are some odd rules in place to prevent her from returning to old ways. One of the oddest is that if she ever feels she must act, she calls the person she is closest to, in this case her fiance, and talks about why she feels she must act, first. So far, it has worked.
The important thing is to not place too much emormity on the behaviors, even as you set in place rules to control them. If you have a trauma background, be you multiple or singlet, it is quite likely that the feelings that prompt self injury are.. are almost awesome in their magnitude. At times controlling the behaviors may seem to be a hollow triumph, but that is not to be taken as a signal to revert to the behaviors again. It is only a sign that it is time to face the slavering beast you are running from; the feelings and memories which you feel cannot be endured.
be well, my friend.
Tir Nan Og
no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 12:12 am (UTC)I'm so sorry to hear you are having a brutal night. Sending lots of hugs and support. Sometimes I really wish there was more I could do than that.
"...there are times when one must simply writhe like a worm and feel horrible feelings."
How well We know this. Goddess hon, if I ever come up with a better way, you'll be the first to know. Hmmm... although, we negotiated with Dandelion and Char using cigarettes as bait. Instead of cutting, they could smoke. Now several of Us smoke to avoid the horrible feelings. I'm trying to work up the courage to face whatever cigarettes manage to obscure, but it's not solely up to me, and We keep wimping out.
&Oh, shoosh, We are not wimping out. You have no idea what you're asking.&
See?
I agree with everything you said here, and you, as usual, said it very well. This is mostly a fishing expedition. This question has been bugging several of Us for a while, from a purely intellectual viewpoint, and tonight seemed like a good night to ask it. Thanks for answering, what, with the flaming going on and all, it helped to see you here.
I think We're for bed now.
Sending light and comfort.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 11:39 pm (UTC)"The important thing is to not place too much emormity on the behaviors, even as you set in place rules to control them." I couldn't agree more: emphasising self-injury as a horrific, monstrously evil deed just makes it worse. There is something about this in I Never Promised You A Rose Garden... the behaviour must be taken seriously, but not too seriously.
Must be said
Date: 2004-04-01 11:54 pm (UTC)Shawn
Re: Must be said
Date: 2004-04-02 12:00 am (UTC)If you would like to give the male perspective on multiplicity, please jump in and say whatever you like about your own situation. There is no need to feel isolated on the basis of your biological gender.
Re: Must be said
From:Re: Must be said
From:Re: Must be said
From:Re: Must be said
From:Re: Must be said
From:no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 02:52 am (UTC)I also do not know how "trauma" is to be defined. It seems to me that life is intrinsically harsh, and that those for whom it is not are the exceptions rather than the rule. Perhaps much of the current trend in this country toward deliberate self-harm stems from an unreasonable expectation that it should not be harsh. People in other places whose lives are often a great deal harsher do not generally seek to harm themselves; more often their focus is on survival by any means possible.
I sought physical death once, many years ago, that seeming the only reasonable and honorable solution to the dilemma of my existence at the time. It had nothing to do with anger toward my Kin; my anger was toward myself for having failed of my purpose, and I was grieved and confused. Afterward, I was ashamed to have caused harm to my Kin, and resolved not to do so again.
We have always been together, we three; we did not become as we are through abuse. I do not think any of us are "alters", or any one of us is "the core" - what we are is family, and would not choose to be parted from one another under any circumstances. Three bodies instead of one would be more convenient, of course, but since we cannot have that, we are content as we are.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 09:18 am (UTC)"Perhaps much of the current trend in this country toward deliberate self-harm stems from an unreasonable expectation that it should not be harsh."
Processing this... and, in part I think you are right. But, I think another huge factor is that in many of these harsher societies, the experience of the brutality is not denied. In many cultures, very painful and, to us, degrading practices are accepted as part of life and seem to cause very few ill effects in large segments of the population. I think this is because people are basically social (even elves are social... not as strictly hierarchal, and possibly different in other regards, but we do possess an instinct for grouping) and get many of their clues about reality and identity from observing those around them. So, when a life-threatening situation occurs, it is included in and creates no troubling contradiction with the persons social reality, and therefore creates no dilemmas, no paradox, and can be accepted as part of reality.
In Western society as it is currently conceptualized, it seems that so much brutality is denied, swept under the rug, kept secret, that those experiencing molestation, beatings, rapes, neglect, are essentially told to behave as if it wasn't happening, or as if it was their fault. This response to a life-threat offers no resolution for the emotional and physical energy that gets stuck in the body and soul. This response creates a severe split between the "inside" reality and the "outside" reality, and becomes a source of pain and confusion.
Now that I think about it, I wonder if this split between the situation you experienced in the time before and the kind of society and reality in which you find yourself now might not be a huge contributing factor in your own experience of distress and confusion. The dilemma of your existence might be alleviated a great deal if you were in a society which honored and validated your existence, and also honored and valued the paradigm of the culture which you have lost.
Hmmmm...
"Three bodies instead of one would be more convenient..."
How often We've longed for a cloning device that would allow Us to produce enough bodies for those who want their independence, and just let them go and be free.
%I guess straight cloning wouldn't work in your case, as you need bodies with different genders than the one you are in now. If you ever figure it out, let Us know. For more reasons than one *wink, wink*.%
=Be well friend, and pay them no heed if they disturb you. Young girls need to flirt and your sense of honor, regardless of your corporeal situation, means they are safe with you, so permission has been granted. If you are offended, please request them to stop.=
Sending light, dear Duathir!
no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 06:08 am (UTC)~BrokenWings
no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 06:54 am (UTC)Hi Jess, Our Answers
Date: 2004-04-02 12:29 pm (UTC)Re: Hi Jess, Our Answers
Date: 2004-04-02 05:33 pm (UTC)Take care!
no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 01:36 pm (UTC)Anyway. We have four self-destructive Members in Our system, all four are cutters, one has an eating disorder (is that considered Self-Destructive? I think so) and one who bruises herself.
Before We knew We were a multiple, Ruby (the host) was cutting, so from my standpoint, I don't think the two are connected, I just think it's a coping mechanism that happens to be one that coincidentally, some members of multiple systems use.
-Cor
no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 08:05 pm (UTC)The connection I see is invalidation. I'm singlet but autistic and grew up being trained to act like an NT person, with very heavy expectations- that to my folks seemed perfectly natural and reasonable. It wasn't so much the failing of the expectations, it was their complete inability to instinctively understand my viewpoint. I felt non-real, or like an alien, mostly like a complete failure. Failure even at FEELING or being or existing. Something so horribly wrong- and I had to behave in learned ways and act as normal as possible.;
If I'd got into self-harming I'd have got HEAVY into it. The need was there, it just went unmet.
I had no capacity to 'be anybody else' who might pass muster. I'm not sure if I'm better or worse off for that, because I'm still living with the pressures of failing to comply. I may always have that, I don't know.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-02 09:05 pm (UTC)The definition of "trauma" is kinda technical, at least I feel so... because one person's definition of what is traumatic to them is entirely different from someone else's perception. For someone, their traumatic breaking point might only come at a one-time, life-threatening event. But I don't think it has to be life-threatening to be traumatic, or only happen once. I think it could be something drawn out... anything that pushes someone's emotional capacity, over and over, especially if it's on a daily basis. I was teased brutally every day for a year in 7th grade. And while it was verbal abuse, it still was as hurtful as being consistently whipped, and this was every single day at school... and while physical pain goes away, emotional pain like that doesn't. It certainly wasn't life-threatening (as far as I know, no one ever threatened me physically) but I would still consider that somewhat traumatic.
but anyway. I think self-injury is not dependent either on trauma or multiplicity. There are many different reasons people self-injure.
no subject
Date: 2004-04-03 09:14 am (UTC)