[identity profile] linnai.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] multiplicity_archives


Started out seperate but neither cooperative nor co-conscious in any way.

ONE person and then someone else REPLACING them and no one knowing about anyone else except for hindsight.

Existed as a hive mind, for lack of a better term from the age of about 9 to about two years ago, at 19-20ish. All sort of blended and half integrated. Seperated but NOT ENOUGH, if you get the idea.

Two years ago plus about a month, introduced to the idea of multiplicity and there was a forced split of all into seperate spaces, no more blending, no more coexistence, singular thought reigned.

For awhile it was OK and the last months, about six or eight of them, have just been so horrible, so chaotic and lacking in any form of cooperation it's just been a mess...

Recent count had frontspace up to around 10-12 active fronts, none of which were getting along well. The overall total is a helluva lot higher, ranging in the 60s for fronts, over 200 for "soulbonds" or other members and others unnumbered.

What do you do when you finally come to terms with the fact that you DO work better with fewer parts? Things got totally out of hand.

Partially to blame is some sort of innate ability to identify active perspectives of humanity in general, and society around the body and it "calls up" fragment-parts that have voices, that either fade back away pretty quick and leave a gaping hole or stick around, but are amorphous and not quite whole enough to really work together with anyone else...

Looking into perspectives. We're already working out some sort of... method for ourselves. Condensing where it's possible and organizing, sorting, getting things to work out. But looking for perspective... needing to see if others have had the same issue(s) and how they've worked with them/resolved them?
(deleted comment)

Date: 2006-10-05 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sethrenn.livejournal.com
Okay, a couple things I can think of:

-For some systems it's normal to create "temporary people", who fade into the background soon afterwards, or after they've done whatever task they were supposed to do. We've done a bit of this ourselves, we call those kinds of things shells, as we don't experience them as being parts or pieces of others, just as temporary constructs.

However, be careful when you decide you've found someone new that they actually are autonomous, and not just someone you already know of who's age-sliding or in a slightly odd mood. There actually are some therapists who do this, who label it someone new every time they perceive you as acting even slightly different, and this can make the system seem a lot larger than it is.

-My experience is that the way the dynamics of large systems tend to work is that there can be a huge number of people, but there's a limited number of people in the "working crew" at any given time, who do most of the fronting on a day-to-day basis. If we counted the numbers of *everyone* past and present in our group, and those who've never even fronted at all, people would probably wonder how we could "function with so much chaos," when, in fact, the number of us who tend to work with things on a daily basis is usually anywhere from 5 to 10 people. We had an ex-friend who wanted to "help us discover new people" (I'm not convinced all the ones she "found" were real), but then continued to insist that *all* of them should be available at the front at *any* time. This resulted in things being way more stressful than they would have been if she'd left us alone.

Date: 2006-10-05 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
A lot of people that had good experiences at the front and who want to experience it again?

Rota? Timetables? Just "taking time" for it? A lot of people can be very considerate of the system's needs, if the system is reasonabley considerate of theirs.

Lead pipe works for those who are less considerate ;)

Date: 2006-10-05 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
I worked with Iris and used my diary. I was working solely from the MPD/DID model from the literature. Having read Truddi Chase, I assumed that my people all originated in a single mind that divided or gave birth to others; but that even if they had started out that way, they were now persons in their own right.

So I didn't exactly proceed from the usual assumption that multiplicity arises either from dissociation or from the splitting-off of emotional reactions. More like being under stress as a child induces the birth of other minds. My biggest mistake was failing to take into account that one person may have many different moods. Also, by misunderstanding them all to have arisen from my own personal experiences, I tried to catalogue phases of my own life as different persons who I felt I "was" at that time. Anytime someone, me included, behaved a little differently, I would think it might possibly be another person and note them down.

This took a lot of straightening out later. Oh, ghod, we did the lists of names and jobs and everything. You know, like "Faith holds the anger." uhh, no, she just gets pissy. We did the whole "mapping your system" thing, too.

I had no idea about the nature of the gateway back to our world -- except as a vague concept I thought was a metaphor for the kind of creative visualization you're supposed to do in therapy (you know, "visualize a safe place where your alters can meet and talk") until sometime in '99. I still don't claim our world has any kind of objective reality -- I can't, there's no evidence. My subjective experience of it is what changed.

Date: 2006-10-05 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
If you work better with fewer parts... have people step back and let the system run properly? There's no crime in realising how your system works best. We don't tend to bring up and lose people fast, some people do. Whatever works, works.

Any more than just me and Lu as main front runners would put too much of a load on us, since being so prominent in the body seems to eat up a lot of energy and mental effort. Anybody else who ever turns up will have to deal with that, unless we somehow manage to up our ability to withstand higher numbers of people.

Partly this is because we don't just kinda, 'switch front'. It's like having two people trying to be The Real One, the original, whatever. I figure that's heavier on the brain than just switching around like the other headmate(s) here do.

If we ever needed to cut down, we would.

Date: 2006-10-05 02:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
If the parts that aren't whole protest, maybe they have a point :P I don't tend to think of 'bits' as being things that can argue back. If they can argue back, they're a lot more than just a bit, and deserve a degree of respect for it.

If they they seem incapable of being bothered by it, then there's probably no harm. Probably. Lol. I could be being really immoral here.

If people are bothered by full integration, perhaps something midway? We blend a lot, and I tend to think of her past as my own, so in that respect we've come a lot closer together. We're not far away from seeing ourselves as one person, TBH, though I'd rather never reach that stage. There are degrees of 'integration' or merging, depending what you're ok with.

Date: 2006-10-05 04:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inner-clique.livejournal.com
do what works better for you I guess
LeAnne

Date: 2006-10-06 06:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kalli-moon.livejournal.com
I was going to say that to. haaaa!XOXOXOXO Kalli

Date: 2006-10-06 08:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] inner-clique.livejournal.com
no biggie :p
LeAnne

Date: 2006-10-12 06:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sharpsight.livejournal.com
N) 'forced split': how was that accomplished? *curiosity*

Date: 2006-10-12 10:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sharpsight.livejournal.com
N) Sort of. When Anja had taken over, were you still concious and thinking? (If so: wasn't it boring, not having a say in what got done?)

Date: 2006-10-13 05:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sharpsight.livejournal.com
N) Ahh.

Thank you.

Date: 2006-10-13 05:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sharpsight.livejournal.com
N) (Was she aware of you/your thoughts during the locked-out time?)

A few questions

Date: 2006-10-13 07:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
If you already existed, that doesn't sound like a split. More like a change in management.

You say you were not communicating with each other, but were you aware of one another's existence? In the process of taking over from Anja, did you establish communication with each other so it could be a collaborative effort? How did introduction to the idea of multiplicity influence your decision? (My theory is that it catalyses self-awareness.) Where were you introduced to the idea of multiplicity?

How is Anja doing now?

Re: A few questions

Date: 2006-10-18 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
You're most welcome. I'm sorry to hear about Anja. Does she understand that she is not alone and that you are her friends?

The way you have described becoming aware of one another, bringing walls down, sounds less like splitting than like what used to be called evidencing. It sounds as if you became aware of one another's existence, but that you already existed, and had for some time.

I wish there were more information on the options people have discovered or created in reorganising their operating systems (e.g., creating "inner world" sorts of spaces, &c.).

Profile

multiplicity_archives: (Default)
Archives of the Livejournal Multiplicity Community

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 07:29 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios