(no subject)
Dec. 20th, 2003 06:37 pmTrigger warnings? links to a 'healthy place'? People whining about their meds, their suicide attempts, their multiple diagnoses and all their pain?
Why don't we just name this group Twinkle Angel Pooh Bear's Happy Safe Hugfest for Broken Survivors of Bad Things and Their Inner Cute Chubby Kids Who Can't Spell already?
Why don't we just name this group Twinkle Angel Pooh Bear's Happy Safe Hugfest for Broken Survivors of Bad Things and Their Inner Cute Chubby Kids Who Can't Spell already?
no subject
Date: 2003-12-19 11:57 pm (UTC)next time i post, it will be about how i love being multiple, and how easy it is and how all the flashbacks are just great entertainment.
while im there, ill give my 4 year olds dictionarys for christmas, so they can spell just as well as you do.
would that suit your needs better?
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 12:20 am (UTC)after thought
Date: 2003-12-20 12:00 am (UTC)Re: after thought
Date: 2003-12-20 12:30 am (UTC)Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
Date: 2003-12-20 12:33 am (UTC)some of us prefer not to let Sybil be the only example of multiplicity "out there"....
iamshadow are entitled to vent a bit at how *annoying* life has been in this comm.. or is that only allowed of the dys-functionals?
Juju & Co.
Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:interesting thread
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Re: after thought
From:Ante Up, coz I'm about to CALL
From:Re: Ante Up, coz I'm about to CALL
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 01:04 am (UTC)Yes, some of us are tired of the Fuzzy Shredded Wheats Winding Stairs to Splintered Redemption and we like life. If the DIDiots don't like *that*, they can thread it, lube it, sit down hard and spin clockwise. And we're not letting the DIDiots chase us off out of everyfuckingwhere. They should give those poor kids *full access* to the body's brain for one, because not doing so is child abuse of the worst kind. And yes, dictionaries and books and Cthulhu stuffies and living dead dolls. And waterbombs.
Hear, hear!
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 01:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 07:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 11:41 am (UTC)Um. Should I pretend that was posted by one of the littles or just admit that I'm a twenty-something man who likes stuffed animals?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-21 07:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 01:26 am (UTC)... comes out to the same thing as in mainstream society, though: keeping silence so as not to rock the boat. Not that silence is a bad thing, of course, but sometimes I have the urge to say what I really think, and it's a little annoying to realize just how unacceptable that would be.
*shrugs* I am quite adamantly anti-psychiatry: I agree with Thomas Szasz (http://reason.com/0007/fe.js.curing.shtml) that there is no such thing as "mental illness", and with Peter Breggin (http://www.breggin.com/brain-disablingch1.html) that psychiatric medications achieve their effect by causing brain dysfunction. I also agree with Caroline Myss (http://edgarcayce.com/whypeople.html) that a lot of people don't heal because they're getting more out of staying hurt. None of these are popular views.
I like being multiple. I love my 'brothers' dearly; they love me; we work well together. I like being autistic too; the advantages greatly outweigh the disadvantages. Sure, I have pain and "issues", but as far as I can determine, all people have pain, so I am not going to use mine to play "Can You Top This?" - tedious game, that, and I quickly grow bored with watching others play it.
*wry grin* I always wonder what's up with these littles who cannot spell, but who CAN type, and can manage a computer well enough to interact on a blog or chatsite, and... well, it just seems odd. I also wonder what's going on when members of the same 'system' post to one another online... I mean, really, aren't they right there in the same body?
Whatever, y'know?
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 01:36 am (UTC)It would seem to point to the fact that the kids are given selective access to skills on a blow-by-blow basis.... When one of them has something to say that someone ELSE in the system wants them to say, their spelling and grammar improves dramatically. The trest of the time, they aren't allowed standard skills for their age-group even. It's... ew.
Good post!
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 02:27 am (UTC)I wanted to say something along those lines, but I knew I wouldn't be able to word it quite right- very good post, especially the part about _everyone_ having some pain, functional or not. More people have to realise this.
We are all different and so have our differences, but we still have to try and get along. This morning I went to comment on another post here, but decided to keep my mouth shut instead of getting involved (I would have practically been shouting at the original poster, and I don't think it would have helped the situation).
(I'm going to friend you, if you don't mind ^_^)
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 06:39 am (UTC)Sometimes it's easier to leave a post-it note outside the head than in. =P
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 09:29 am (UTC)As for multiples writing to themselves online, you have to remember that not every multiple can communicate the way that you do. Some multiples never have direct communication with the others in their body so they have to rely on external communication through notes or journals or messages online. Others may have problems with identity or mushing or some facet of fronting makes communication difficult so that it's easier for them to alternate control of the body to post messages and communicate that way.
You also have scenarios where one person may say their piece but then someone else disagrees. So rather than disrupt the first person's post they'll make a second one about their opinion. Then there's always the attention factor. Some people will do it just to show the world how crazy or cute or whatever being multiple is.
(no subject)
From:interesting thread
From:Re: interesting thread
From:interesting thread
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 07:07 pm (UTC)Shandra
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 04:37 am (UTC)--B.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 09:57 am (UTC)As for you, personally, none of us have noticed you participating in any of that sort of behavior in this community. The fact that you are proud of the progress you've made tells me that you're working to become functional instead of proudly wallowing in your disfunctionality. No one would berate you for that.
Plus you have to remember that being functional doesn't mean you're perfect. Being functional is working around obstacles so that you can live as full and complete a life as possible. You can still have issues with your past and be functional. You can lose time and be functional as long as you've worked out a way to deal with the information problems and how you're going to manage responsibilities if people switch at inopportune times. Being functional is respecting each other and working as a group in whatever manner works best for you. Being functional is fixing the things you can and dealing with the things you can't and not wallowing in things in stead of improving them.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 08:58 am (UTC)*amused*
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 12:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Yes,
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Just out of curiousity...
Date: 2003-12-20 10:25 am (UTC)Everyone is growing up, some more slowly than others, but we all have to begin somewhere. I haven't even read the post(s) you're talking about yet, but my guess is that someone hasn't grown up quite as much as you think they should, so you're going to bitch and moan about it.
Try seeing things from another point of veiw, not your's where your system works, but another's in a system with violent alters who can't be controlled, and destructive alters who'd love to see nothing more than the end of said system, and risky alters who would try anything twice, who'd sleep with anyone, take any drug, or race anyone down on a dark and rainy night, and real children alters who are just that: children, too young to know any better and confused about the "world" they live in. Mix all three components and add one, maybe two responsible alters who try to keep things balanced.
Multiplicity can, by all means work. The issues we all have dealt with can work, but for some it's more difficult than others. For some it takes longer than others.
As I said, I haven't read the post(s) which this was directed against, so maybe I'm wrong and someone out there is just whining for attention. Maybe that someone is actually the destructive one in their systems, but either way, they're at least trying to hold things together. You sit up here all high and mighty because your system works, maybe you should step down and offer a helping hand, show them how you got to the point you're at?
interesting thread
Date: 2003-12-20 01:42 pm (UTC)We were not always so functional...shrugs for like 25 years we were pretty damn dysfunctional with a lot of teh characteristics you describe. shrugs we are 3 now..total.
things are better but not perfect.
ty for saying what has been on My (and others perhaps) minds.
El
Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:Re: Just out of curiousity...
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 11:47 am (UTC)As far as littles who can't spell but can use computers goes, when Puchiko wants to say something (it's not often, but it happens) one of us will get everything set up for her, so all she was to do type what she wants to say. And when I was her age, I was also perfectly capable of pecking at keys on the keyboard. Usually though, someone else will just write for her, because changing the formatting to Japanese is a little tricky.
no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 12:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-20 08:08 pm (UTC)You seem quite willing to thumb your nose at everyone regardless of your functional/non-functional status. And that's fine. You're entitled to your opinions. And we're entitled to ours.
Yep, I did it! So?
Date: 2003-12-21 02:11 am (UTC)There was a non-multiple who came into the group asking if we were all some new evolution of humanity. He asked if we were perhaps the new "way showers." Since he obviously had no idea (by his own admission) what being a multiple was all about, and had "just learned about it" (also by his own admission), I felt that to be fair to him, giving him just a bit of other information might help him in his search for knowledge.
Since the information and cache of articles on Healthy Place is so extensive, I chose to post two pertinent points, and link him to more information, should he care to learn more. Certainly, Healthy Place is not the be-all and end-all of the vast amounts of information out there and certainly can not substitute for real-life experience.
Although YOU may not have any trigger problems, some certainly do, and out of fairness to them, I posted a warning.
You seem very hostile that some people may have an interest in helping others learn more about the lives we lead as multiples. I wonder why?
The lives *we* lead...?
Date: 2003-12-21 09:38 am (UTC)Re: The lives *we* lead...?
From:Re: Yep, I did it! So?
From:no subject
Date: 2003-12-22 10:02 am (UTC)How about your ego for presuming that all of this is about poor little you? Why go through the trouble of pointing out how nothing they were complaining about applied to you? Shouldn't you have realized that if it doesn't apply to you then you weren't the poster that they were complaining about with that example? You're hardly the only person that's posted to this community.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: