(no subject)
Dec. 7th, 2006 04:54 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Today in my abnormal psych class we went over dissociative disorders with a focus on DID. My professor used to work as a clinical psychologist for 20-some years, and to support the idea that multiples are extremely rare he mentioned that he had never met one in his entire career.
So I'm wondering... should we prove him wrong? It was so tempting to just jump up in class and be like, "Not true! You know ONE multiple!" but of course I didn't. I was thinking of going about it in a more discreet way, perhaps asking him if he'd like to meet a multiple. Hmm.
Any suggestions?
Also in class we were going to watch the video "Mind of a Murderer" about a serial killer who tried to get off on insanity by saying he was a multiple. The tape didn't work so we didn't watch it, but it annoyed me that of all views of MPD/DID to see in a video it'd be THAT one. Of course this guy was proved to have been making it all up to get out of jail so he wasn't actually a multiple, but still. Discussing multiplicity in the context of murder doesn't lead to positive opinions =/ (Although my professor clearly understood that one has nothing to do with the other and the tape was to show how it could be faked, who knows what the other students picked up from that.)
So I'm wondering... should we prove him wrong? It was so tempting to just jump up in class and be like, "Not true! You know ONE multiple!" but of course I didn't. I was thinking of going about it in a more discreet way, perhaps asking him if he'd like to meet a multiple. Hmm.
Any suggestions?
Also in class we were going to watch the video "Mind of a Murderer" about a serial killer who tried to get off on insanity by saying he was a multiple. The tape didn't work so we didn't watch it, but it annoyed me that of all views of MPD/DID to see in a video it'd be THAT one. Of course this guy was proved to have been making it all up to get out of jail so he wasn't actually a multiple, but still. Discussing multiplicity in the context of murder doesn't lead to positive opinions =/ (Although my professor clearly understood that one has nothing to do with the other and the tape was to show how it could be faked, who knows what the other students picked up from that.)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-07 10:11 pm (UTC)Amalah
no subject
Date: 2006-12-07 10:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-07 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 02:57 pm (UTC)I also did what someone siad below, writing many papers in my psych classes on multiplicity and challenging the whole "survivor multiple" and it being a "disorder".
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 08:20 pm (UTC)- Kat
Two things
Date: 2006-12-07 11:06 pm (UTC)1) Telling the entire class this, though amusing, is likely to get you labeled "the crazy". This is generally not good.
2) Telling him privately may not be useful. Think about what you're trying to accomplish and decide whether it's worth the risk of someone you don't know finding out.
Both of these vary with the amount of "out" you are about being DID. Personally, I'd be cautious.
Re: Two things
Date: 2006-12-07 11:18 pm (UTC)Re: Two things
Date: 2006-12-08 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-07 11:20 pm (UTC)You could always say you know people who have it, gives you a starting point, and isn't really lying or anything.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 12:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 12:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 12:50 am (UTC)In the end I came to the conclusion that the prof had very clear biases and telling him of my diagnosis was going to be counter productive. Instead, I wrote my papers on multiplicity including one on the validity of DID as a diagnosis, which I got an A on. In effect i was telling him that he was wrong in his biases without being confrontive.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 01:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 02:39 am (UTC)I'd say just come out and say it sometime only you and he are around, but not many people/systems are willing to do that.
--Diz (and some Axel)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 03:20 am (UTC)our minds as real things that define their selves in relation to things within and
without our minds.
Oh, wait a second, that *IS* the argument i had with a shrink friend. She seems to have
accepted it ;-)
When we were in college we ALWAYS debated the professors in class. Only a couple objected and some even thanked us for spicing up their classes.
Oh, and read some R. D. Liang and contrast him as being in touch with human reality as
opposed to Karl Jaspers who is cold when it comes to observing difficult human
realities.
Those are my arguments ;-)
--- Marina of Mtribe
no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-08 06:04 am (UTC)Oh ghod, was that that stupid thing they played on "60 Minutes" a few years back? We remember being in chat while watching it, and then one of the people being interviewed went "You just saw a man dissociate before your very eyes" and we said "That makes it sound like they dropped him in a vat of acid."
no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 12:12 am (UTC)The letter idea would be good.. though probably either giving an alias or c/o address.. would be the best option since he abhors email.. we wrote and anonymous letter to one of our professors, cause we were leaving the school and had tired of his tirades.. about two weeks previously.. (he spent almost 3 weeks talking about DID/dissocciative disorders..
good luck with whatever you decide.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 03:14 am (UTC)Three weeks, in an introductory level class? *boggles* Wow, someone is obsessed.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 03:27 am (UTC)-Gabe
no subject
Date: 2006-12-09 04:59 pm (UTC)Also, during art school, we brought it up to two of the professors because it made sense as the art was a constant dialogue about being multiple. They seemed a little confused by it, but in the end, it was a valuable experience for all of us.
Now, working on a Masters of Oriental Medicine, I realize that two of my professors know, and one of them is the clinical director of the school. Both experiences have been extremely positive.
Maybe we live in a wierd, rosy bubble, surrounded by open minded people, but the experience here has been that if one of us feels moved to "out" ourselves, and there is a sense of trust and relevance within that impulse, it is the right thing to do.
But we don't do it with people who don't generate a sense of safety and acceptance, and there are definite situations where we keep those cards right up close.
I guess my advice would be to look at the impulse to "out" yourself to this guy, and try to determine where it originates. If you are trying to prove a point, if your professor is closed minded and biased, if either one of you has an ax to grind, I'd say it probably won't go well.
But, if you are secure in yourselves and you think there may be a benefit, for you or for him, then it might be worth it. It could be a learning experience for both of you.
Also, I'm realizing that the few times we have "outted" to someone in the psych community, they've been thrilled and interested, they've asked many questions, they've become friends. I know this isn't true of everyone in that profession, (Oh GOD how well I know) but alot of people study psychology because they are truly curious and fascinated with the diverse expression of human consciousness, and your existence could be a delight and wonder to them.
Or not. *grins and shrugs*
-Kat of Khailitha
no subject
Date: 2006-12-10 05:38 am (UTC)