Rapid Switching
Aug. 30th, 2006 08:50 amWhen in a chatroom with alleged multiples, they seem to switch very quickly between their mates. In one comment they're a little, and two seconds later they're a big, and three seconds after that they're an "angry alter", etc. For many reasons other then this though, I believe they're faking. But just wondered if this is possible for others.
I've tried to have my group better at rapid switching where we can switch out quickly and be completely separate while fronting because I think it would benefit certain situations, and I can't do it that fast.
Cofronting is even difficult... Our thoughts are kind of meshed... Or come out as one thought between the two of us. But they don't come out "I want to go!" "Me too!" All in one blurb.
I was wondering if people can truly switch as fast as these people in the chatroom do, because we can't do it even when trying!
I've tried to have my group better at rapid switching where we can switch out quickly and be completely separate while fronting because I think it would benefit certain situations, and I can't do it that fast.
Cofronting is even difficult... Our thoughts are kind of meshed... Or come out as one thought between the two of us. But they don't come out "I want to go!" "Me too!" All in one blurb.
I was wondering if people can truly switch as fast as these people in the chatroom do, because we can't do it even when trying!
no subject
Date: 2006-08-30 02:27 pm (UTC)What we can do though is have two or three people up or close to front at once without necessarily getting blurred together. Or we can have one person at front and others throwing comments in from further back, without actually switching out. So if we were in a chatroom and had three people co-fronting, it'd be easyish for us to type thoughts from different people in rapid succession. So, we could easily be typing stuff like "Steve: I want to go!" "Jim: Me too!" "Mabel: Nah, it sounds stupid, I'll skip it" - but we wouldn't have actually switched at all in that time, we were just labelling which thoughts came from which people, because in a chatroom (unlike in real life) it's possible to do that easily. So, uh, maybe that's a possibility?