(no subject)
Nov. 13th, 2005 05:49 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hmm. Bit of a controversial question perhaps.
What does anyone know about integration? NOT the forced "everyone needs to be one" sort of integration but spontaneous, natural integration and also temporary intregration or anything of the like.
(While I have heard that most integration is non-permanent anyhow, this isn't quite what I mean but having a hard time figuring out how to communicate the thought better, forgive me)
What does anyone know about integration? NOT the forced "everyone needs to be one" sort of integration but spontaneous, natural integration and also temporary intregration or anything of the like.
(While I have heard that most integration is non-permanent anyhow, this isn't quite what I mean but having a hard time figuring out how to communicate the thought better, forgive me)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 02:07 am (UTC)My T is a believer of everyone communicating to be healthy while his partner is a believer of integration at will, meaning he *teaches* how to control others. I don't know much about it but it doesn't sound fun to be controlled and lose my opinion.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 03:04 am (UTC)By teaches I don't mean tells/controls, they guide and quite often are more like a sounding board and someone to calm down a person if they become distressed. They encourage no-dependency on themselves and as I didn't mention before and probably should have, they teach/encourage self-soothing and self-support. No progress is started until a person is able to want to do it for themselves and is strong enough. (I'm not sure strong is the word I'm after)
Teaches was a poor word to explain controlling others as I mean it to be that he teaches EQ (emotional intelligence) and as most multiples that he sees are trauma-based, he speaks of how to know what is appropriate and how to communicate so the more strong-willed persons don't bull-doze the situation or other people.
Quite often these multiples have survived to this point on their own and only need fine-tweaking in communication and co-consciousness and not rejecting their others (my word for my people).
Sorry if I was a little unclear, I'm a little frazzled at the moment.
Sora
no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 06:58 am (UTC)Just be careful . If the goal is integration I will say again all ( every single fiber of everyone of you have to really want it) or it will not work for long and mess up communication till things get back to normal or whatever your normal is as everyones is differnt.
Thx Elaine, House of Mosaic Gang
no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 01:47 pm (UTC)From what I know of re-birthing, self-soothing is very different. However, I am not sure we are talking about the same self-soothing here. Self-soothing in the context I have used it means to soothe oneself (or many) through means of the skills within ourselves and the things we know will calm us. Say if one of your group was distressed by something and you knew that their favourite stuffed toy always made them smile and cheer them up it would be helping them to get the toy and use it to calm them. It works with favourite smells and memories as well. Sometimes it's not a simple as I've explained though.
I also think that America and Australia are two very different health systems as multiplicity isn't well known and considered (although not true) very rare and is only heard of if it is in an ill-representing movie.
Sora
no subject
Date: 2005-11-15 07:22 pm (UTC)(this, of course, is nothing like traditional rebirthing ceremonies, which are largely initiatory in character)
no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 02:30 am (UTC)You have my sympathies. If I had a nickel for every time I was stuck alone out front...
no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 01:48 pm (UTC)So mad!
no subject
Date: 2005-11-14 10:24 pm (UTC)