Mooooooore skeptism

[withfangs.livejournal.com]

Please bear with me. My boy, Max, posted here a while ago, in regards to me, and he's trying to push me more into having conversations with others about my own doubts with multiplicity.

When I was young, I began studying other religions, and I really became interested in spirituallity. Along the way, I discovered two others living within. Really, this is just background information, so no know thinks I'm trying to troll or rag on the community. I've been aware of my own multiplicity for a number of years. I also see my multiplicity as a means to my own personal spirituallity. That is, I don't have a set religion, but I see the presence of and communication with my system as being a self-enlightening, holy experience.

I see this huge resurgance of multiples on the internet, and it makes me skeptical. NOT, because of the fact that their multiples. I wouldn't call someone out on being a "fake". But, the way some of these systems carry on, it makes me wonder how they can reasonably function.

I'm going to point the finger at soulbonding, because it seems to be the means of multiplicity that houses the greatest number of loonies. I can accept, per se, that another has entered your system, and is a bad influence, and perhaps is forcing your body and system down a bad path. I can not, however, accept that this entity causing harm is, say, Sephiroth from the Final Fantasy games. That, is insane. Final Fantasy is fiction. It may very well be an entity that projects images OF Sephiroth into your mind, but part of gaining some feasible aspect of functional control over yourselves, is seeing through the bullshit.

I have trouble with people who play INTO that bullshit, by extension. Not only do they seem to be the loudest group of loons, but they're also impossible to have a reasonable discussion with. Everything boils down to "it's different for everyone", which is great for upholding any kind of deluded fantasy that you might have, but really, isn't productive for conversation.

Especially...if you're attempting to learn something, or see if they have a reason to act the way that they do.

Are there any rational, sane soulbonds, here? If so, do they honestly believe that they're fictional characters? This seems to be the most levelheaded community about plurality on LJ that we can find, so I figure it would be the best place to start.

Comments

Re: Sanity

[nematoddity.livejournal.com]

First thing: insanity. Well, to be fair I don't believe I'm insane primarily because I'm a multiple, even a fractured one. I believe I'm insane because of the OCD, the panic attacks, the walls breathing at night and the radio talking to me. I've had time to come to terms with the fact that my perceptions of reality are *not* everyone's, and that they shouldn't be; but in my head, the line goes if you think the radio's talking about you--and whether it's on or not, you're hearing it talk about you--you aren't whatever passes for "normal". Whatever that is. I'm mostly just relieved I'm upright and functional enough not to be drooling in the corner of some locked ward. Frankly.

And maybe it's me, but...believing that "fiction" here might be "reality" elsewhere has been a constant of speculative fiction, and certain schools of philosophy, for decades now. Heinlein took on the topic and made a book of it with Number of the Beast. That, I'd believe. Actually, that I do believe.

How'ver, most of the information I've run across--which, I grant, is not all the information available--doesn't make this connection. It mostly seems to reference "I was watching this anime, and X character walked into my head" statements. Which is where, you know, I start backing away and nodding, so as not to overtly disturb the crazy person.

*shrugs* But I'd agree with you, religion and soulbonding seem equally eccentric.

Re: Sanity

[sethrenn.livejournal.com]

First thing: insanity. Well, to be fair I don't believe I'm insane primarily because I'm a multiple, even a fractured one. I believe I'm insane because of the OCD, the panic attacks, the walls breathing at night and the radio talking to me.

You consider yourself mentally ill, or you consider yourself insane? As ksol1460 pointed out, sanity is really a legal term concerning the ability to judge one's actions as being right or wrong.

*shrugs* Well, I always figured a lot of the "this character walked into my head" was just a description of the person's subjective experience-- that they weren't necessarily out to prove this person existed as a real separate individual.

Re: Sanity

[nematoddity.livejournal.com]

You consider yourself mentally ill, or you consider yourself insane?

Gah. This is a case where the linguistics are bogging us down. "Insane" being the catch-all term used in a non-legal sense, "mentally ill" being the personal unverified (save for the OCD) conclsion of self, not external by professionals of any sort.

Using ksol1460's definition, I am sane. Using my own, I'm not, but I'll bridge it to say "mentally ill" if that's more helpful.

I always figured a lot of the "this character walked into my head" was just a description of the person's subjective experience-- that they weren't necessarily out to prove this person existed as a real separate individual.

Right, whereas I've been taking such statements more literally, and getting very confused--because if someone walked into your body, that's a spirit possession, and as far as I know from my experiences, I've never met a spirit, ghost or entity that looked and acted like it walked out of Final Fantasy or Evangelion.

Dead people? Sure. Animated people? Never. But again, that's me, not everyone.