Yes, I am.
Feb. 22nd, 2004 01:22 pmHey all, I just wanted to introduce myself. I was diagnosed DID a little less than a year ago. Since then, I've worked with it myself trying to make my triggers ease up. To an extent, they have. I'm making progress, but just need people to talk to about it. Does anyone want to talk?
Sorry for being so dry, I'm a little nervous...
Sorry for being so dry, I'm a little nervous...
Sure
Date: 2004-02-22 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-22 10:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-22 11:53 am (UTC)Our triggers such as they are have to do with PTSD and not our multiplicity, so the best thing we've found is to face right into them. If we can develop new associations and contexts for the things that bother us, they don't bother us anymore. Time and new experiences are also wonderful things.
Re:
Date: 2004-02-22 12:34 pm (UTC)thanks for replying!
Date: 2004-02-22 01:01 pm (UTC)Re: thanks for replying!
Date: 2004-02-22 02:10 pm (UTC)Re: thanks for replying!
Date: 2004-02-22 10:13 pm (UTC)There is a very long history of people who are multiple getting misdiagnosed with all kinds of other things because doctors don't think multiplicity is that common -- it just doesn't occur to them. This happened even in the 80s and 90s. And nowadays of course, they're trying like mad to sweep all multiplicity under the rug because of the scandals and lawsuits connected with the recovery movement! Half the time I don't think the doctors really see their clients anyway. I think they just want to stamp numbers (from the DSM) on them so they can collect their $$$ from the insurance co.
Re: thanks for replying!
Date: 2004-02-23 12:50 am (UTC)Sex can often trigger switchiness in me. A LOT of switchiness. Sometimes it's along the lines of "oh, cool, I want to be part of this" and someone shoving someone else out of the way. Sometimes it's a very disturbing switch into one of the sexually abused children or fragments with alot of attending PTSD reactions.
Are you experiencing something similar? Are you in a relationship with someone who is able to process stuff with you as it comes up?
I've found that therapists really like to throw diagnoses at things. It seems to be a cultural habit that if we NAME something, we don't have to LOOK at it anymore. We can slot it into a known pattern and go into a programmed response. Don't get me wrong, names are important as hell and defining things is a good way to start interacting with them, but relating too closely with a diagnosis can blind us to what is really happening. My advice would be to tackle the issues that seem to be giving you the most problems without worrying too much about the clinical definitions. Just a thought.
If you want to talk about the sexual stuff more privately, I can give you my e-mail address. Sending light.
Re: thanks for replying!
Date: 2004-02-23 11:32 am (UTC)Yes, if either of the two of you, or anyone else, wants to talk shop about this more privately, contact me if you like. I know I've only spoken of this with my lover, and it would be a real relief to discuss it with someone who has shared the experiences.
Re: thanks for replying!
Date: 2004-02-24 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-22 02:36 pm (UTC)Angie
no subject
Date: 2004-02-23 03:02 pm (UTC)so yeah hey! welcome.