[identity profile] thecuteone33.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] multiplicity_archives
Hiya -- I just posted something else about writing.  I'm kinda new to this community (not new to LJ -- just been inactive for a long time).  I've read a couple of threads/postings under the gender/sexuality topics. I'm not sure where I fit into all of this -- maybe I'm being a bit too label conscious.

I'm actually female -- "Carrie" I guess I'm the host -- is pretty happy with the parts I have. When I was young -- I started puberty early -- and I really had a hard time grasping gender roles/sexuality. Most of my alters were boys -- straight boys initially. I think that gender identity and sexuality was a fused concept for me then.  Girls weren't supposed to like girls and I hated having to wear a bra when i was 8, etc... I never liked being "Barbie" i wanted to always play "Ken" because I pictured myself with a Barbie.  As I had gotten older -- approaching my 20's -- my male alters started to become more bisexual/gay but I came out as a bisexual woman (yes in college hate to perpetuate the stereotype).  I still have a lot of issues with men but I still identify as bisexual -- and my male alters tend to be more gay in identity but more straight in action.  Does this make any sense??

I wonder if most people with DID/MPD have more of a fluid sexuality?  Does having different gendered alters is a factor?  Does trauma (sexual abuse) play a part as well?  What about Gender identity?  Does that get mixed up with sexual identity?  Love to hear feedback about this.

--Carrie--

Date: 2007-08-01 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Gender and sexuality may be more fluid, for singlets as well as plurals, than many people would like to believe. After your previous entry, I'm a bit curious: do you actually have DID or MPD, or are you just multiple?

Re: Not sure about the terminology...

Date: 2007-08-02 04:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lb-lee.livejournal.com
DID/MPD is a diagnosis concerning fronting, memory problems, and also 'disorder.' Being multiple generally means having more than one person in a body, regardless of memory or disorganization. Does that explanation make sense?

So, for instance, if you share a body with your imaginary friend, even if he never fronts, or you never lose memory, then you can be multiple, but not MPD/DID.

Re: Not sure about the terminology...

Date: 2007-08-02 08:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com

Perhaps this would help. (http://www.livejournal.com/tools/memories.bml?user=multiplicity&keyword=multiple+without+did/mpd&filter=all)

What I was asking was: do you actually believe you have dissociative identity disorder or multiple personality disorder, or have you been diagnosed as having either condition? Or are you using those terms to describe the simple experience of being multiple? *points to what [livejournal.com profile] baaing_tree says*

Many people do not know the difference and think that all multiplicity is MPD or DID. MPD is not DID; the description and treatment guidelines were radically revised following the overdiagnosis scandals and lawsuits of the 80s and 90s.

In any case, I have no direct answers for your questions, because these things are a matter of personal experience. What is true for you will not be true for others. I do know that many groups include persons who are opposite-gender to the body, and that group members have the same variety of sexual orientations and gender identities as singlets.

Re: Not sure about the terminology...

Date: 2007-08-03 12:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
The current psychiatric view, more or less, is that DID is a mistaken belief that several minds coexist in one body, and that this ideation forms as a defense mechanism in response to childhood trauma. I understand that some people actually experience dissociative identity disorder, but it is not at all the same as simply being multiple. Dissociation, flashbacks, or blanking out of traumatic events, as in PTSD, do not appear to be an intrinsic part of multiplicity, going by our and others' experiences.

As far as I know, a fugue state is a type of memory lapse where one typically wakes up in an unfamiliar place, having lost several hours' to several months' worth of time, e.g., Ansel Bourne.

Re: Not sure about the terminology...

Date: 2007-08-04 06:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Why even bother with a label? And are they alters or persons?

Re: Not sure about the terminology...

Date: 2007-08-05 08:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Alter is the word generally used by mental health professionals to describe the members of a multiple system, in an MPD or DID context (since non-disordered multiplicity isn't officially recognised). Generally, although there are exceptions, the predominant view as we understand it is that alters are compartmentalized emotions, ego or feeling states, and/or memories which have been personified. They are not seen as independent people in their own right but as parts or pieces of a single person. (More at http://www.astraeasweb.net/plural/issd-tgl-2005.txt)

Some groups, including members of this community, perceive themselves as consisting of one main person with a number of subsidiary alters, and they call them that (some also say "parts"). Others experience coexisting with a number of independent, individual persons.

If you feel that the people with whom you converse, etc., are not people but aspects or alters, then by all means call them that (and remember that they may see things differently).

Many community members, ourselves included, do not view their multiplicity in terms of the above psychiatric definitions. If these definitions work for you, use them; if not, you need not constrain yourself to them.

Date: 2007-08-01 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] krystale.livejournal.com
I agree with the above comment. Additionally several gays in one system is exactally like what it's like when we hang out with a group of our gay friends. Some people gawk here, some there... it's... not really any different, except that several gays internally causes the same problems that any sexually or romantically active system has, which is difficulty agreeing because of different preferances. The same would hold true of those gay friends of mine if the group was forced to choose together.

Re: The switch from Straight/gay/bi...

Date: 2007-08-01 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] linnai.livejournal.com
I'm sorry. I am curious. How was it that Charlie determined his sexual identity and why would you want him to be something other than he is sexually because you are something else?
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-08-02 12:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hold-me-coldly.livejournal.com
Hi Carrie! It's Leigh!

You may want to try [livejournal.com profile] fragmentedminds if you're not a member there yet. It's more DID/MPD-oriented. ;o)

Re: Hiya Leigh!!

Date: 2007-08-02 03:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hold-me-coldly.livejournal.com
Don't mind at all! I'll go add ya now. (I update here incessantly. I'm a lot more comfortable with the navigation here than Tribe. Been using it a LOT longer.)

-Leigh

Date: 2007-08-02 05:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tej-agni.livejournal.com
I don't know. I know I'm female and like this body is female too but I know that most of the others in the group know what gender they are I guess. I don't think any of them have changed genders but I don't know that for sure. I haven't gone around and asked them or anything lol I guess anything's possible right? though like I don't have mpd or anything and I'm not plural but I'm part of a plural group. ♥
LeAnne

Date: 2007-08-02 09:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shade-durza.livejournal.com
Very interesting questions you got there.
I'm transgendered myself. This body was born as a female but I feel it should have been male and I'm currently working towards that. As long as I know I've been bi-sexual but I see that as something completely seperate from the gender-identity.
I know a lot of other transsexuals and they don't change their sexual identity after their body changes. The very few that think they have done this were usually afraid to come out as gay and can now enjoy a more safer straight relationship which is more easily accepted. I almost never heard of any stories the other way around i.e. from straight to bi/gay. It gets confusing doesn't it? :)

And then we still have to add the multiple factor to it, but personally I do not believe it has anything to do with it. Although the others are all male I do not think that makes me transgender. If I was happy with a female body I would have kept it that way even if a million guys would be inside me. I still wouldn't be happy with my body if all the others were females for that matter.

Sexual abuse can play a part in how you develop and leaves a lasting impression on your sexual identity but not on your gender identity. If people who have been abused think they have the wrong gender it's usually because they feel their own body is dirty or think they can escape their past by changing who they are. I know psychologists are really careful when somebody applies for a gender-change and has been abused because almost all of them regret the change afterwards.

I'm just lucky that I've been in contact with very good therapists and other transsexuals in a support group where we discuss these topics frequently. :)

Date: 2007-08-04 06:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sethrenn.livejournal.com
Well, we used to think we had "gender confusion" because there were times when we felt female and times when we felt male and others when we felt androgynous/both/neither and times when we felt we wanted transition and other times when we didn't... *shrug* But a lot of the "confusion" came from us being forced to think and act as one person, and pretend to identify with the body, when we were actually of different genders.

Since we've been able to sort out more of who was fronting when (in our past), the reasons for some of the "gender-confused" feelings have become a lot more obvious.

Date: 2007-08-04 08:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sethrenn.livejournal.com
I think like most people in the U.S....we take those two things as being the same thing -- but they're not.

*nodnod* I've known several people who went through that, really. I'm stereotypically "girly" in some ways (I like trying on new clothes, new personal care products, etc) but not so much in others (my tastes in entertainment).

But there were definately some people in here who used to go "omg, I don't want to play with Barbies and I'd rather play video games and I don't want to get married, does that mean I'm really a boy." It seems funny now, but... when you don't know any better, it feels like serious business (and not in the "lol internets" sense either :p)

Date: 2007-08-04 09:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weirdiguess.livejournal.com
Think a lot of stuff affects it. The first person here is a little fluid but that's just her. The big thing here seems to be sharing a head. You share a brain with someone and stick around them 24/7, it's going to affect how you think. I don't really like it but it happens and I just try to avoid it best I can. Selene seems to think abuse can affect it too. Don't see why it shouldn't.

w00t

Date: 2007-08-05 01:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] devcandy.livejournal.com
I just wanted to make a cheering noise for your bringing up that people in the same group can influence each other just as is the case with "external" groups.

It's something I've seen people try to use against groups, which makes some groups try to prevent it, and it just gets messy.

Arashi (嵐)

being queer

Date: 2007-08-09 07:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zamisista.livejournal.com
sorry i'm a bit late to add a comment, but wanted to share our xperience. we had two males, several girls/women and some ungendered beings in our system. for a long time, we used to have two or more relationships as a system, to keep everyone happy. basically the little ones liked big strong men, JD who is a teenage boy liked femme women and the big one liked butch women. anyway that all got too complicated and people were upset even though it was all open relationships. so then we cut back to one man, and tried to keep JD from doing his thing. which didn't always work. so then JD came out and ditched the guy after we were married, and it was a big mess. my point is that trying to stuff the desires of one of our family members only worked for so long and then it all fell apart.

more recently, one of the boys in our system became a girl (that's a different story, she was hiding out as a boy), and JD integrated with me, and we became a lesbian/queer woman who likes butches. so now we only have one relationship. Our partner is a partner to all of us who are old enough to have a partner, and she talks to and acknowledges all of us as important and having rights. now we have a fluid sexuality with one sexual partner, playing different roles depending on who is out (not to be too graphic!). And we identify as a queer system which is less limited than saying we are a lesbian (therefore female). I think it is important to find ways to honor and express the desires of all family members that are old enough, while respecting any prior relationship. and to introduce your partner to your other inside family members (alters).

hope this helps.
J, J system

Profile

multiplicity_archives: (Default)
Archives of the Livejournal Multiplicity Community

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 6th, 2026 08:34 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios