Alters screenplay
May. 8th, 2007 05:15 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
I don't have MPD / DID, but I've had two close friends with DID and have known several others.
I'm currently working on a screenplay which I'm hoping will cast multiplicity in a favorable light, and would love to get some input.
The log line: A college student with multiple personalities must make a choice between the boy she loves and the alters who've kept her safe since childhood.
Although there's no explicit sex or violence, I've tried to be very straightforward, so there may be some triggers.
The screenplay can be downloaded it at www.fileden.com/files/2006/11/5/350846/Alters.pdf
Comments can be directed to dianneordi at excite dot com. Use "Alters" as the subject.
Thank you!
Dianne.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 08:02 pm (UTC)She doesn't have to have a little in her system that's the "innocent".. cliche 2.
She doesn't have to have stereotypical people living within her system. The innocent. The slut. The bitch. The one who doesn't know about anyone else. Cliche 3.
Did you even READ my last comment or did you just just see there was one, then hit "reply"?
The movie going public is not going to want another "Identity".. That was a painful enough pile of shit to eek through the first time. I'm not saying so you have to make her a happy fluffy being, but the sexually assaulted messed up "disordered" DID, NOT multiple, is overplayed. If you wanted to REALLY make a movie to help bring healthy multiplicity to light, you failed MISERABLY.
The "me or them" storyline.. It's an overplayed situation in any case, so cliche 4.
Need I go on, or do you see it yet?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 08:54 pm (UTC)Now, your cliches...
#1 - The trauma origin. Okay, yeah, it's a bit cliche, but it does happen, kind of a lot. At a guess, I'd say at least one in ten of the systems even on this community started from trauma. The real problem with it is that it has nothing to do with the rest of the story, which is a bad way to start anything.
#2 - Okay, B.J.'s, what, four? Four-year-olds only get so world-weary and jaded. And anyway, little kids are hard to write. I thought it was done pretty well.
#3 - Having less sexual inhibitions than other people in your system doesn't make you a slut. Zoe seemed pretty normal, in that department, it's just that Heather was critically shy. Suzanne was a little bit trite, true, and didn't really add much. And the one who doesn't know about anyone else, yeah, okay, it's done a lot, but it's also an interesting plot twist, and it lets her get in a scene about what it's like to wonder if you're crazy, etc.
#4 - This one I can't argue with. Johnny talked about this before - it's not just a cliche, it's also harmful and false.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 09:24 pm (UTC)Can you give me movie examples where the "me or them" storyline is used? Where the protagonist's determination to become a single actually makes her life worse? And when she gets what she thinks she wants, she realizes she's incredibly lonely and misses her family?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-10 02:32 am (UTC)And you keep talking like you've written the multiple's Invisible Man, but you haven't. Heather gets rid of her head mates, and then gets a job, loses her jerk boyfriend on amicable terms, and marries the boy she loves. That's what you wrote in the script, it doesn't matter what you write in the thread. She decided to become a singlet, her life got worse, she was lonely, but then she got over it and everything worked out better than before. It's like you wrote Invisible Man and then set the manuscript on fire.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 09:03 pm (UTC)I'm rewriting right now to remove the sexual assault.
Of the three multiples I've communicated with on an ongoing basis, all three had littles. I guess I'm not quite sure why you're saying my use of a child multiple is cliche. Is there something in particular that B.J. does that -- as a multiple -- is cliche? Are there films that you can suggest that use the child multiple in a cliche way? Are you saying that B.J. shouldn't act like a child (innocent), or that there shouldn't be any littles at all? (As I remember in "The Three Faces of Eve," "Psycho," and more recently, "Lord of the Rings" (gollum vs smeagol) "Heroes," none of the multiples have had littles.)
What about B.J., Heather, Zoe, and Suzanne do you find cliche? Heather is intelligent, shy, a medal-winning skater who's great with kids. Zoe is a geeky, self-confident tomboy. Suzanne is an anti-establishment waif who enjoys singing and speaks French. B.J. is a precocious kid who enjoys drawing. I wouldn't consider any of them a "bitch" or a "slut."
As for "the one who doesn't know about anyone else," several people here have suggested that's a rarity. Can you give me an example where it's been used in movies as a cliche?
Finally, the "me or them" story line. What about it do you find cliche? Again, can you give me examples of movies that have explored this? I'm not making a documentary or a docudrama, so what would you consider an acceptable conflict? What would you consider an acceptable story line?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 11:04 pm (UTC)Finally, the "me or them" story line. What about it do you find cliche? Again, can you give me examples of movies that have explored this? I'm not making a documentary or a docudrama, so what would you consider an acceptable conflict? What would you consider an acceptable story line?
Please read my article through. What you consider an acceptable storyline is, in the end, entirely your decision, but you will be responsible for presenting a specific image of multuplicity to the public. The "me and them" story creates tension, sure. But what impression of multiplicity does it give?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 11:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-09 11:09 pm (UTC)Jess
Better opening?
Date: 2007-05-09 10:40 pm (UTC)Re: Better opening?
Date: 2007-05-09 11:13 pm (UTC)Re: Better opening?
Date: 2007-05-10 12:20 am (UTC)Re: Better opening?
Date: 2007-05-10 02:36 am (UTC)Re: Better opening?
Date: 2007-05-10 04:18 am (UTC)