Pronoun Confusion
Feb. 4th, 2007 11:56 pmHow deep does the habit of saying 'I' extend for you? Do you have the habit?
We'll say I even when we're having conversations with each other, which hindered our self-realisation somewhat.
-Seb.
We'll say I even when we're having conversations with each other, which hindered our self-realisation somewhat.
-Seb.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:24 am (UTC)However, we say 'I' in internal conversations. 'I' when talking about our individual selves, rather than the body.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 12:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 02:21 am (UTC)-Leigh
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 10:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 06:34 am (UTC)and yeah.. we call it normalflage.. sometimes we're good at it.. the more stressy we are.. the less we use "I"
-Gen
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 09:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 09:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 01:45 pm (UTC)i asked them to just say "I" when talking about themselves, and if i'm not sure who's out, i'll just ask.
i know this was more of an internal question, but it's a big thing in our friendship bc a lot of times she's kind of blurry and co-fronting and Natalia doesnt really have a voice so she has to borrow someone else's, so sometimes I think she is someone else, so i think there are more people in there than there are......
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 02:10 pm (UTC)-Butterfly
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 07:59 pm (UTC)I'm surprised no one has brought up the old UIL convention from darkpersonalities... "using 'I' loosely". This is something we would use if we were mooshy, especially. I might say "I mailed your package today" but actually about 6 people were involved, either actively frontrunning or as onlookers.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 12:30 am (UTC)Front for example, Jess did such and such. Hope that made sense.
Lori
no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 02:04 am (UTC)"we" slips out a lot more often than intended, most of the time we make a conscious effort to use "i", to avoid uncomfortable questions. my (now ex) sister-in-law caught the "we" usage once when there was no real way to pawn it off as a "me and my hubby" sort of thing and we've been kind of nervous about it ever since. it's not like i'm not out to my friends, but i don't really want to explain it to random people who i know probably wouldn't be very understanding.
though it's hard to say for us right now. we're still trying to get back in touch with each other. we've been through a rough patch with the divorce (a lot of why he left had to do with us being "too much drama") and for a while there the system was in disarray and a lot of us were attempting to reject the multiplicity. it's getting better now and we're starting to communicate the way we used to again. and, yes, the usage of "we" to mean first person singular is increasing as we get comfortable again. it's pretty hard on us self-esteem wise to refer to the whole package as "i", as individuals feel devalued when we can't be accurate in our speech.
rina and nine of the Crowd
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 08:40 pm (UTC)We talk about others in the third person, too, mainly so people can say 'oh right, it isn't x then'.
Does anybody else find that they see the external body as just a shell? Even the person who was born into the body, Kerry, calls it 'the body' as opposed to 'my body' these days. She looks different on the inside anyway.
Liam
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 10:52 pm (UTC)- Kerry of the Fen System
(notices there's a Kerry in your system, too!)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 10:14 pm (UTC)Actually, Kerry isn't her original name, but it's the name she takes inside. (Her original name that her parents gave her was based around a weak pun...)
no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 07:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-06 11:46 pm (UTC)- Kerry of the Fen Group, commenting with group journal
no subject
Date: 2007-02-15 08:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-13 02:18 am (UTC)i had to think about it a little bit, but others tell me that the way we used to refer to the body was as an interface through which the spirit deals with this physical three-dimentional reality. i'm not out dealing with physical reality hardly at all, so i couldn't remember what they used to say. - aether
we're currently coming out of a period of integration? repression?... something along those lines... and nobody had thought about it in a while. i wouldn't say that it's a shell, that to me implies that the body brings nothing of it's own to the over all identity and i don't agree. many of us find that it is by interacting with the body and dealing with the differences that it has from our inner conception that we learn new things about ourselves. and it a way, it has a sort of "personality" the way that i feel my laptop has a personality, even though the computer for me is an interface. i hope that makes sense. - alia
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 09:03 pm (UTC)'We' usually is only used in those rare circumstances when it is important to specify that I'm referring to both of us as distinct individuals - not something that comes up in conversation that often, especially when I can ocunt the number of people who know about us on one hand.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-05 11:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-08 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-08 05:06 pm (UTC)LeAnne
no subject
Date: 2007-02-08 05:08 pm (UTC)LeAnne
no subject
Date: 2007-02-10 06:06 pm (UTC)