A Discussion Question
Jan. 31st, 2007 12:59 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
We just found this article and were mildly shocked. What do you all think? We're posting this here for discussion's sake.
hthttp://www.spiritlink.com/scrmpd.html
Enjoy,
Jess and Alissa
hthttp://www.spiritlink.com/scrmpd.html
Enjoy,
Jess and Alissa
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 01:56 am (UTC)As much as it's very sad that most people assume integration is the only possible happy outcome for somebody who is multiple, I do find that in multiple communities the pendulum tends to swing the other way a bit, and condemn integration completely.
I think it's too easy for people to just assume that somewhere at the center of things, all people are really just like they are. That's why a lot of folks don't really believe in multiples, they are just one person, and surely these people who claim to be multiple are really just one person, showing different aspects, or being deluded, or whatever. I had another multiple try and tell me that my system didn't work the way it actually does, but rather it worked more like how his systme works, and it started to get a little frustrating!
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 02:05 am (UTC)However, that doesn't stop me from thinking that it's a valid goal, if agreed to be the goal by the whole group.
The whole... deciding that another system is a faker/attention-seeker/delusional/etc thing (or, even if genuinely multiple, are very misguided and confused) if they work too differently from you is something I've seen, though, and I agree, gets really frustrating. I've actually noticed a tendency towards it in some of the older writings I did online about multiplicity, which is a bit embarassing. But... live and learn, I guess.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 03:29 am (UTC)