This would be Allen, not bolding all the way through to spare your eyes.
It's a pain in the ass to realize that your memories before connecting here don't match up with the comic book you "came from." It's even more of a pain to have people believe you're a fangirl projection because of it, and the fact that you speak American Standard English rather than High British. (I don't even know if those are dialect names or not, sorry if I offend anyone who does.)
It's just painful to re-read something you'd been repressing since it happened to you and only realize halfway through just why you repressed it. (Suffice it to say, if I'm covering something over and burying my memories of it, there's a reason.) Particularly if it's violent and painful enough to warrant flashbacks when you remember it.
It's also painful to know that there are doubtless people even here who think I'm nothing at all worth talking to because I'm "fictional." Guys? That Allen Walker isn't me. He may have had the same experiences I have in some cases, but I am firmly confident that I'm still human. (And I'm involved with a girl out-of-system in the place where I am, but that's another matter, partially concerning the way we work as a system, so I won't take up time with that here.)
I guess what I'm trying to say with this is that yeah, we're two-thirds "fictional" over here. Doesn't mean we're any less valid. Maybe I'm oversensitive, but some of the body-girl-person's friends have been making snide remarks lately and it pisses me off. It'd be nice to know that I'm not alone in having to deal with this.
It's a pain in the ass to realize that your memories before connecting here don't match up with the comic book you "came from." It's even more of a pain to have people believe you're a fangirl projection because of it, and the fact that you speak American Standard English rather than High British. (I don't even know if those are dialect names or not, sorry if I offend anyone who does.)
It's just painful to re-read something you'd been repressing since it happened to you and only realize halfway through just why you repressed it. (Suffice it to say, if I'm covering something over and burying my memories of it, there's a reason.) Particularly if it's violent and painful enough to warrant flashbacks when you remember it.
It's also painful to know that there are doubtless people even here who think I'm nothing at all worth talking to because I'm "fictional." Guys? That Allen Walker isn't me. He may have had the same experiences I have in some cases, but I am firmly confident that I'm still human. (And I'm involved with a girl out-of-system in the place where I am, but that's another matter, partially concerning the way we work as a system, so I won't take up time with that here.)
I guess what I'm trying to say with this is that yeah, we're two-thirds "fictional" over here. Doesn't mean we're any less valid. Maybe I'm oversensitive, but some of the body-girl-person's friends have been making snide remarks lately and it pisses me off. It'd be nice to know that I'm not alone in having to deal with this.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 11:08 am (UTC)I've said it before, somewhere else, and I'll say it again here, even if it pisses some people off: saying that somebody is not real because he or she has their origins in fiction rather than being a this-world alter is the height of arrogance. It is elitist and stupid.
Anyone who thinks my experiences and memories aren't real is invited over into our head and body when I'm having a flashback or panic attack *smirk*. If you still think I'm making this up afterwards, you're a lot more delusional than I could ever be.
- Draco
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 12:21 pm (UTC)People will think you're a fangirl. Even people like me. Initially, that's all we can see. But flashbacks and other assorted issues are not fun to deal with, and believe me, they do seem to help when explaining to people that it is your reality. Our way of viewing it is, we didn't sit and 'make up' me having sudden body memories and not knowing what in God's name they were, so we should probably not view myself as a fake, at least not completely.
It happens. You could always just tell them to grow up. I don't care whether my friends or my host's friends believe in me, I wouldn't believe in me if I were them. Making snide remarks to the host however is childish and stupid.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 06:52 pm (UTC)The suffering=reality thing has less validity than it appears, maybe because it gets overused. Like in the MPD fad ("nobody would want to make up such horrible memories, so they must be true") and on one forum we were on a few years ago which discussed other worlds ("My world must be a real place because it's a bleak bitterly cold barren place and we have terrible wars there DEATHBLOODKILLETC.") Arrrgh.
Anyway, there's no proving any of it, so yes, what counts is to have friends who don't require proof of any kind.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 09:44 pm (UTC)So, I guess, I don't think that angsty past = real, but I do think that actual physical reactions to things, especially things that nobody in the system even after much effort can pinpoint, lends a degree of credibility. I tended to think "If I was just making up angsty abuse memories, I would be crying and all sorts. I wouldn't be in a state of shock having just been sick." I could be wrong, but I think it does *help* somewhat.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 02:49 am (UTC)...I just wanted to add that, in my comment below, I mean the same kind of "flashbacks and other assorted issues". Not RPing about things, not talking and crying which might or might not be crocodile tears. (For what it's worth, we are incapable of crocodile tears. If one of us cries, something HURTS.)
It depends on the people and what they already think of you, not what you experience. You can be in a genuine state of shock, you can be shaking like a leaf, you can be suicidal and depressed... it doesn't matter. Some people will take it for what it is, and others will take the very same thing as "acting for attention".
The difference seems to be whether people are already inclined to give you the benefit of the doubt, or to do nothing but question you instead.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 05:31 pm (UTC)It's all kinda... mixed. A lot of things make up whether someone will take you seriously (including that person themselves.)
I guess I think of flashbacks etc giving more credence, because with me, I typically don't *tell* anybody. I talk about them openly now, because the ones I think of as most relevant were a year and more ago so I'm ok with them. When it comes to the actual time, I generally didn't tell many people, if any at all.
Some wouldn't accept it unless they watched it all happen (the abuse/events/whatever) with their own eyes I suppose. There's no reasoning with some people. I know that for me it seems logical that someone's less likely to be attention whoring if they're not actually getting any attention for it. But I'm not everybody. I tend to think everybody's brain must have a 'logical' setting similar to mine hidden somewhere, which is pretty silly of me, but hey :P
(*pokes your Chloe icons gingerly*)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 10:55 pm (UTC)I think much of what determines that is what others consider attention. Some people consider it demanding attention if you're in the same room when they're working. Others don't even blink about making unannounced visits where they pound on your front door yelling "I KNOW YOU'RE IN THERE", and are surprised for that to be interpreted as anything but Super Friendly.
I guess what I mean is that I completely agree with you. A lot of things make up whether someone will take you seriously (including that person themselves.) It's a matter of chance who you run into, and who you don't.
(*pokes your Chloe icons gingerly*)
Oh! It's okay, I'm not another Chloe. My name is Hikaru. I use Chloe icons because we look very alike, and I like her in general as a person... though from a distance, of course, since I have never met her and only know the Noir TV show.
Um. Could you pass on good regards to your system-mate?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-19 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 02:42 am (UTC)In our experience, they don't. In our experience, flashbacks and issues lead many people to conclude that you're not just "fake", but a drama queen looking for attention. Not everyone, but enough people to give you even more issues to deal with in the future.
...I know making that as a comment-response to you is probably "Snrk haha WTF" on your end, but it is true. It helps with explaining to some people, it hurts with explaining to others. Que sera, sera.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 12:45 pm (UTC)Ah, hmm... Several of us see that as a convincing case for fictivity being a sort of "oh, and by the way, I'm" thing. ...that is to say, something that should be told after someone gets to know you first and foremost as a person in your own right.
More on this later. We've been getting ill and a bit tired.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 02:08 pm (UTC)Life's just easier that way. People are less likely to dismiss you once they know you.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 04:10 pm (UTC)But then again, she wasn't completely honest with them at all. She went about pretending to be a physically separate person, totally disassociating herself from multiplicity at all. And when the truth did come out, several people were like "Omg you LIED to us! Rawr! UR CRAZY!"
A few people did continue to accept her though, deciding that on the internet, it really doesn't matter who or what you are on the other side of the screen.
I guess thats just how it goes for everyone though. No matter what you do or how you present yourself, there will always been people that won't accept you. The people that do are the important ones.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 04:15 pm (UTC)But I have other friends, online and in the earth world, that don't know, and I often wonder if I should come out to them at some point. I sorta feel bad keeping such a big part of me a secret from them. Especially when I'm quite used to talking about the bonds to people. Or using "we" instead of "I" sometimes.
I kinda figure one of these days something will slip out. I'll forget who I'm talking to and say "we" or I'll mention of of the guys offhandedly, and questions will arise. I'm just not sure how I'd go about explaining things if there was a slip.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 04:21 pm (UTC)Yay typos!
Also, slipping up and using "we" instead of "I", isn't always bad for me, cause "we" could mean anything. "Me and my daughter", "Me and my husband" "Me and the friend I'm staying with", "My family in general" etc. Theres a whole lot of "we"s here.
So if I tell someone. "We're going to the store." I could be talking about me and the physical people around me. And most people I talk to know there are a few physical people around me all the time.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 06:31 pm (UTC)I've also found that its much easier to slip to "we" instead of "I" when drunk.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 01:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 04:01 pm (UTC)Being seen as a fangirl is one of my biggest worries. Especially when you got the REALLY obsessive fantwits out there, making the rest of us look bad.
All you can do is ignore the people that make you or your host feel bad. Sometimes thats easier said than done though. Whats important is how you feel about yourselves and the fact that real friends will accept you no matter what.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 05:07 pm (UTC)And also, if these friends know of your existence and of your "canon" and are still making such snide comments, they are not acting like good friends. Even if they don't believe, they should not make you (collectively) feel bad for believing.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 05:46 pm (UTC)Michael
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 06:29 pm (UTC)The undercurrent that the fictionally-sourced aren't valid alters irritates me, too. I've toyed with signing my posts with a pseudonym, but even if I like the nickname, it isn't me. I still use a bit of a pseudonym in icons, but that's in part due to the difficulty in finding imagery of various moods and emotions I'd like to use in icons.
I can't help being who I am. If the fact that I'm essentially from a video game is too bothersome to others, then they're too bothersome for me to waste time justifying my existence.
~Celes
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 06:52 pm (UTC)Exactly my stance.
Though I do use a pseudonym. But it actually does work with who I am now, so I'm not really bothered by it.
--Benjamin
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 06:44 pm (UTC)Just like I'd love to hear someone say Pandora isn't real because she's from "Mythology". People are just always skeptical, don't let it get to yo.
*(hugs again)*
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 09:19 pm (UTC)-Keis
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 10:09 pm (UTC)With that said... I have to admit, fictional soulbonds make my scientific scepticism itch.
(Says the wind elemental.)
Oh, shut up. The thing is, present company excepted, there are a lot of attention-seeking fangirls and -boys on the internet. When I read claims like that from people I don't know, well, I try to keep an open mind, but the least hypothesis is they're mistaken or making it up.
But when you say you have memories that diverge from canon, that actually makes me believe you a lot more. For one, it's fangirls that are more likely to be obsessively canonical. Second, it doesn't make sense for someone real to be the same person as someone fictional, but I can think of several ways a real person could come into being as a "clone" of a fictional person - and my sisters are identical twins, so I know perfectly well how clones tend to become different from one another. (I'm leaving aside the topic of whether and how a fiction-sourced soulbond would continue to interact with canon. As far as I can figure out, it would be neither impossible, nor required, nor simple enough for me to guess how it would work. [Translation: he tried to think about Cloud watching Advent Children for the first time, and it broke his little brain.])
I guess what I'm getting at is, well, maybe I was one of the people you were talking to in this post. But what you've told me makes me much more willing/able to accept it. And if you want an outsider's opinion, I think I agree that telling someone you're a soulbond should wait until you know them. It seems to me like telling someone you're psychic - if they don't know you, and aren't psychic themselves, they have no real reason to believe you.
Rob (and Johnny)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 12:34 am (UTC)With me and canon, it's a love-hate relationship. Sometimes they get things exactly right, but most of the time Hoshino's really off. (Not even going to talk about the animators right now.) I'm not that Allen Walker, that's for hell sure--the "divergent clone" idea seems to make the most sense. (Then again, if I can actually make sense of my own existence there's something wrong, isn't there? Aren't we as humans supposed to not be able to do that?)
Um. We know a Cloud who apparently doesn't like Advent Children too much, having seen it. So yes, that's happened and the world en't ended yet.
I do apologize if I came off as... frankly rather bizzare in the OP. I've just had a rough week, though that's really no excuse. I'm glad, however, that you're a little bit more likely to believe me or Dad now, if still skeptical. And... well, there was no other way to tell Sarah I existed short of saying "You know that one guy? With the arm? Yeah, that's me, I'm sharing headspace with your best friend now." So while the whole woowoo thing is best kept under wraps, it's sometimes unavoidable when talking to singlets who're concerned at their friend's apparent complete change in personality.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 12:51 am (UTC)No canon is complete. There's plenty of things that go unseen. Whole years of life, internal thought processes, even and especially the little details like favorite color. But you're right; the ones that seem canon-obsessive are the ones who are most likely to be fangirls who are experiencing soul-puppetry, rather than someone really experiencing it, someone surprised as all hell to have a character they know start talking in their head. (Took my host years to come to terms with it, and that wasn't helped by the fact that we had a hard time actually communicating.)
I'm awaiting the canon rerelease with trepidation. Not only is it making the fandom reawaken (and damn them all to hell for their ridiculous and distasteful "'shipping-wars"), but I really don't want to relive some of the things that happened to me. Plus, seeing it done wrong...well, it essentially is an adaptation. Authors (and fans) get irritated when their works are movie-adapted badly, leaving out major scenes or important though seemingly minor plot devices. It's a similar thing. I'm watching what's purported to be my life, but I reacted differently, I said different things, things happened in a different order.
It's all one big headache.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 03:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 03:31 pm (UTC)I completely identify with that. The same thing happened to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 03:01 pm (UTC)(I wondered if Cloud would bring up that translation bit :P I've gone through similar, though not with that specific character/canon. Funtimes.)
I generally only tell someone up front if they're either, coming from a place like multiplicity and so it wouldn't be *too* much of a mind fuck, or I'm trying to 'test' how open they are to outright weirdness. I don't use pseudonyms generally (though I have one, and as you can see a whole bunch of representative icons that are not me), but I don't go all out either, not unless I start talking to them regularly. The rest can just find out next time I post a fiction related ramble, which is fairly rare.
And yeah, there are a lot of fangirls around... I'm generally cynical about Bonders until I know them. Even some I *do* know.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 09:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 06:48 pm (UTC)For me, the hardest thing about the canon that I see is that it gets things right and wrong. It's painful to have something portray your memories with a great deal of accuracy, and then two seconds later see yourself put into a situation that you would personally never contemplate. If it was completely wrong, it would be much easier to dismiss. If it was completely right, it would just be a record, almost a biography. Because it's somewhere in the middle, it becomes painful.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 10:22 am (UTC)The fact that she left me for a girl? Stung my ego a bit. Other than that... we broke up, took a month or so to repair our friendship, and moved on.
-Mark
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 11:05 pm (UTC)As for differing from canon... I find it rather annoying that so many people feel that canon is absolute truth. Who's to say the writers here didn't get it wrong? Or change something to make a better story/movie/game. That happened to me. My host seems to think that certain events in the game I come from make a bit more sense knowing what actually happened to me. No one knows that but you. Especially not some writer sitting on his duff interpreting events from afar.
Lily also wants me to mention for her that there are likely thousands of versions of us bonds out there for every interpretation of our characters, and for any event that someone imagined could happen.
~S.L.
A side note... I despise her icons. This was the most appropriate one I could find for me, so please excuse it. I should upload one for me on this account in case I find need to use it again.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-16 11:07 pm (UTC)And Richard liked the company.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 03:11 am (UTC)I think this is the major issue that many of us have with "being fiction-sourced"-- not ONE of us is "from" this story or that. Maybe it resembles it, maybe that person looks like ours, has the same name, the same genetics, similar experiences if not exact ones... but even so, Not. Our. Person. Not the co-worker we're used to, not the friend and companion, not the father or mother or sister or brother their family here knows.
The assumption that someone is "from" a published story, that the character Is This Person (always and forever, in any world and incarnation), doesn't seem to have a good side to it. Some people will use the whole situation as "proof" that you're "fake". Others will never allow you to have any kind of privacy because they want to hear everything and anything about your oh-so-thrilling "fictional" life. Some will try to reintroduce you to the person they believe to be your supposed One True Love, except somehow in the process they don't remember anything that you do and have also a one-track mind leading into the bedroom with a video camera, so to speak. Or, sometimes, your supposed One True Hate with similar amnesia and a one-track mind leading onto the train tracks.
We have always been more "out-sourced" than "in-sourced". The very nature of our system makes it impossible to avoid, and we wouldn't avoid it. We merely avoid discovery. We've always used codenames, lied about appearances, strictly recouped from accidental mistakes that might reveal one person's "identity" for whatever reason. And... it's incredibly tiring, to know that what was an annoyance when the body was six is still the same annoyance when it's 23, and will be the same when it's 54, and the same at 89, and the same on it's death bed.
Is it really that hard to imagine that possibly, the published story and the person are just total coincidences, with no more connection to each other than two random men in Chicago with the same first and last name?
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 10:11 am (UTC)I am a thinking feeling person. All the more solidified as time has passed - I've been with Evie for two years now (there were others before me) and I am very firmly me. I have some roots in my "orgins", yes, but I'm not bound to them. Some things are different. Some things aren't. And just because I was originally thought to be "just another RP character" doesn't mean I'm not here. I've had to drag this girl through some major shit in the past two years.
Anyone says you're not real? They're not worth it. Move on.
-Mark
(April here to second what y'all have said and be generally supportive and such. Thank you.)
no subject
Date: 2006-11-18 10:32 am (UTC)I wasn't as astonished that Mark suddenly started actually talking back to me when I was writing a story as I could've been, but only due to previous experiances. There's always been at least one someone here (so far as I can remember), but those someones have sort of... rotated through. I don't know why. And mostly they've been "fictional characters", I think partially because they didn't want to scare me, and when I was younger I guess it seemed more rational for me to have Princess Leia talking in my head than someone completely strange and unknown.
And, of course, something Mark never points out (because it never occurs to him) is the fact that he looks nothing like Anthony Rapp, or really even all that much like any other actor I've seen who plays Mark. Nor does he act like the character. So it's not that I have a bad characterization problem - he actively gripes because people assume him to be the same person as the character in the play.
At this point, I'm not sure if this is just getting annoying (because I'm rambling and it's late), but I just had to say something.
~Evie