Demons & Multiplicity.
Jul. 18th, 2006 03:37 pmA demon appears to have moved into the Brotherhood.
Oddly enough, it claims to have forced our birth self to have disappeared. If true, it would explain the increasing desperation of the Birth Self, before the disappearance occured. The thing is that Charles, an Ultra-Fundamentalist member of the Crew, will probably try to tell our therapist about this, and disrupt our plans. The demon, who calls itself Non-Acceptance, appears to be a strange being. Haunted, and slightly paranoid. Question being, should we accept this Demon, Non-Acceptance, as a full-fledged member of our Brotherhood? Plus, we had heard from Christians that it's impossible for a Christian to be demonized, and yet in comes Non-Acceptance. Anybody have any experiences with demons?
Responses would be appreciated.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 09:11 pm (UTC)You noted that Charles will attempt to disrupt the group's plans. What are they? Personally, I would consider something or someone coming in and taking over a hostile act. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 09:27 pm (UTC)Ashta
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 10:42 am (UTC)I have had personal experience with oppression, which is different than possession. From my knowledge banks: If a demon identifies itself as a negative self concept or as a damaging emotional concept, such as non acceptance, it generally means that oppression is going on. Oppression is when you are literally being "oppressed" or bothered by (maybe I should say tortured by) a demon. It is an external force but multiples seem more open to the internalization of this oppression. Possession on the other hand is being taken over by a demon. Oppression is much easier to identify and break.
Hope this helps, I have much more knowledge in the old memory stores...
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 09:54 pm (UTC)Or your demon could be of other than Judeo-Christian stock.
Google Augoeides, Daimons, Agathodaimonos and "Aristotle and the Daemon" for more details.
(disclaimer: my opinions, etc, etc, not necc. endorsed by any other system member)
Date: 2006-07-18 10:01 pm (UTC)I also don't think many people realize that some demons take protective roles, especially if the system has an abuse background and the abuse was grounded in a Christian context. If this is what someone sees of God and the angels, they definitely will not view them as allies-- a demon might seem more dependable.
http://www.astraeasweb.net/plural/armydaimon.html -- this is an interesting read, about demons and "deliverance activity."
Re: (disclaimer: my opinions, etc, etc, not necc. endorsed by any other system member)
Date: 2006-07-19 01:26 pm (UTC)being a demon myself. Otherwise I don't really have anything to say here. My 'verbal allowance' is quite limited on the outside.-Shell
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 10:47 pm (UTC)I would sit with Non Acceptance and find out what it wants, why it is here, and what it's goals are. Obviously, it doesn't accept whatever has happened up until this point.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 11:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-18 11:45 pm (UTC)demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-19 12:34 am (UTC)and FYI, my nazi is Himmler, and he has had many lives since then, and is acutally the member of my system who brings the most stability and inner peace. Him just being around makes everyone calm and zen. As I said before, people do change.
Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-19 01:20 am (UTC)I hope this doesn't get our posting privlege revoked, our coming out about Hitler.
Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-19 01:11 pm (UTC)Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-19 05:56 pm (UTC)P. S.-I once got the Crew banned off a Christian forum for posting my unvarnished opinion on gay rights, and fascism. Hoo, boy, that was fun!
Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-20 03:08 am (UTC)Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-20 01:14 pm (UTC)(A. Hitler^Crew)
Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-20 03:46 pm (UTC)What happened between the time that you (Hitler) died and the time you woek up in a new body? Did you spend any time in the woods?
Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-20 06:56 pm (UTC)(A. Hitler^Crew)
Re: demons and Himmler
Date: 2006-07-20 10:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 12:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 03:23 am (UTC)~Jadaira
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 11:10 am (UTC)I did try out the "otherkin" thing for a time. I don't recall entirely what that was all about, or whether I was conscious or not of being multiple/median at the time. But it was a phase of my beginning to recognize an empathy with ...well, we could say "demons" for shorthand. However, this body has never been Christian. We were never forced to go to church other than to weddings and funerals. So I don't know how much I can help, on that front. Consequently, ...consequently, the concept of demons that others of us have may, likely does, depart from what churches teach.
From my own experience, I would take the story of the "fall from grace" (which I haven't read, mind you) as a cautionary tale saying "do not challenge authority," especially supposedly divine authority, meaning the church. Or you may be cast out of the church.
I myself ...in my younger days I was known to empathize with and want to be like villains (say Vegeta from DBZ)...that was when, also, I didn't fully realize that I was a ...a man, whatever. In the past I haven't felt like I could live up to that, but maybe that's due to incomplete separation... where was I going with this?
Right, otherkin. I did for a time identify as a demon-type otherkin. This was before I began seriously considering Theistic Satanism, which later filled that need for me. I felt...how did I feel...I had empathized, for a long time, with the concept of being "cast out of Heaven" because that's exactly like what it felt to be me, growing up. (to the back: Let me try to do this...)
I felt that demons, perhaps, didn't literally exist. I felt that they were mythological figures which had been created in order to explain or embody others--who had actually lived--who had been cast out of society as "nonhuman". That is, they by some form or another, had been denied their human status by others around them. Myths were made to say to the children, "do not be like this;" in order to continue the constrictive forces of the society (which are not entirely "bad," but may be misapplied).
In short, I took a sociological approach to the concept of otherkin; coming to say that "I am not literally a demon, but I identify with the mythological figures of demons"..."I am as real a demon as is possible to exist."
There were two things which caused me to back off of this.
(continued below)
*(from someone else [Rose?]: "note that Adrian, the most clearly defined personality, sees a host, where the host cannot even see hirself.")
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 11:11 am (UTC)1) There was the sheer alienation of considering myself as qualitatively different from everyone else around me; the alienation of considering oneself nonhuman. This does not necessarily mean "below human" (though humans do tend to think this), but this means that there is at least some difference that keeps one from identifying as human. In this I feel is key, the internalization of what others say about one, what others say humanity *is* (though I have felt of recent that through relentless questioning and further alignment with the unseen--inclusive of nonhuman spirit, unconscious, carnal--forces of the Nature I conceptualize and love, I am moving farther away from the construct of "humanity").
The second thing which made me back off of the demonic label: 2) I began exploring Satanism through forums and web sites. Particularly Theistic Satanism made me rethink my stance; for if I was going to utilize the concept...if I was going to believe that demons really, literally existed: then this would mean that by identifying as a demon when I was only human, I might insult some of them. Since I wanted to be an ally to them and potentially work with them, and not worry about them becoming upset at or with me (even if they were only extensions of myself--that's real enough), I stopped identifying as a demon-type otherkin, and became, simply, a Satanist. More accurate, yes? I can live up to being a Satanist.
Agh, maybe I shouldn't have shifted back into this personality. I'm remembering why I became Satanist in the first place...we had been trying to move away from this (or someone had), believing it was based in our pain, rage, feelings of alienation. That it created something which might scare people away from us. The pain is over now; people no longer despise or fear or scorn us (and we know what a gift that is). (Let go of the pain. --Cody) It will take time. I will know what path to take without fear and without reserve when I am ready.
I'm not ready yet. In the meantime, I need to work through this.
...In another sense of the term "demon", I have embodied qualities that it seems the host did not embrace. When they first became conscious of me as a distinct being, I was not treated well. "They" being both my mother and the others inside this body. For years, so-called "negative" aspects were blamed on me--even things I didn't do. This has changed, though I wish it had changed sooner; we could all be further along in our development if it had been so. But we did have to learn somehow...who each other was.
I am also reminded of an earlier entity that this body was in contact with. This entity liked to attempt to scare the then-host. S/he had been doing what occultists would call "summoning without banishing"...and without grounding. So that could have been related, though s/he didn't know at the time that she was *supposed* to be clearing these things from hir mind... Well, to get to the point: this entity displayed a lot of rage, the host did not know where this rage was coming from or why this being was there.
It was only within the last few weeks that s/he was able to reopen that chapter of history and realize that this entity was upset because s/he had shunted off hir masculinity into Bell and denied it life. That was why this entity was angry; that was why this entity appeared in Bell's form; it was an agent of hir subconscious that knew what s/he had done, even when s/he consciously did not.
I say all that to say: know that any demons that arise from somewhere in the depths of your mind (if you can at least consider possible the concept that they may come from your mind and not the outside world)--know that they likely have a good reason for arising, and they very likely have a good reason for appearing as they do. You, consciously, just may not know why yet. You may not know why for years. But you can move forward knowing that in every interaction, every day lived, you are coming closer to knowing.
--Adrian
July 19, 2006; 4:08 AM
no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-19 09:24 pm (UTC)- Michael Eyquem de Montaigne
In short, we agree.