Children in Chat Rooms
Aug. 31st, 2003 01:56 amI'm new to this community, and new to live journal in general. I've known I am multiple for a number of years now and have great communication, and feel that there are little limits to what the mind can do. The purpose of my posting is asking what you think about people who are multiple who let their system's children to come out to talk in chat rooms? Tonight I was watching in on a chat room where a child did come out and began chatting. I don't have many children in my system so my opinion is based upon just observation of others with no personal experiance. Is this such a good idea? There is no telling who they will meet online. What do you think?
Claire Formay
Claire Formay
no subject
Date: 2003-08-31 12:38 am (UTC)some of our lils have friends they chat to sometimes, other lils, in DID chats and even a few non-DID chats where people know we are multiple...
even lils need to have fun and have friends and stuff like that .. and as long as there are some older ones/adults around, i dont think its a problem ... well, its not for us anyways, i can imagine other people may think differently though..
no subject
Date: 2003-08-31 01:24 am (UTC)Our children don't front much because they don't like the body, but they're vocal commentators on anything and everything that goes on. Children are not helpless; they are active, observant, intelligent, and curious. They are also likely to be some of the most valued members of your group. The more experience with life and reality they can get, the more all of you will benefit in the long run.
Also, children in multiple systems, because of communication and knowledge-sharing, tend to be a bit more aware of the adult world and its implications than out-system children. Don't assume necessarily that they are naive or can't handle themselves. This is true even of children in groups that experienced no abuse or trauma in the classic sense.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-31 10:49 am (UTC)although, i *do* have to admit, me and Julia tend to hover if the kids are fronting....
and there are a few of us in-house who are not really "kid people", and they are never the ones doing any of the 'babysitting'...
Julie
no subject
Date: 2003-08-31 11:27 am (UTC)Okay, our kids do love to talk to people, and they have a lot of thoughts on complex things that aren't the forte of some others. I mean, I wouldn't call them Claudias under any circumstances, because that's an entirely different sort of thing. *shakes head*
Sometimes I think it would be better if they didn't, in some places, but if they want to talk, then why not? As long as it's not say, a sex chatroom, which none of our kids would want anything to do with anyway, I don't see why not.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-01 09:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-01 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-02 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-07 10:35 pm (UTC)My ex and I used to joke that he and Megan (one of her littles) should NEVER be allowed out together unsupervised or the bodies would wake up 12 hours later covered in sticky crud from candy and cookies. Then We'd have to take showers, which would bring up a certain OTHER pair who would shanghai the bodies for a completely different purpose, which would leave the adults out cold, letting The Kid and Megan start the process all over again.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 07:58 am (UTC)Vice.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 08:05 am (UTC)And people wonder why I assigned one of the Internal Security guys specifically to keep an eye on him...
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 04:12 pm (UTC)Claire
no subject
Date: 2003-09-08 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 08:45 am (UTC)Vice
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 10:41 am (UTC)Heh. Sounds like the relationship between Jake and Ray. He keeps asking why he's not allowed to just put a 14.5mm softnose through Ray's brainstem and be done with it already.
no subject
Date: 2003-09-09 12:46 pm (UTC)Vice