Question for Systems
Nov. 6th, 2005 04:06 pmFor those of you that embraced, or at least acknowledged and were aware of your multiplicity long ago:
Do you think this awareness "created" more personalities (allowed them to be born, or however you'd like to describe it), let personalities come out of the woodwork, stop being shadows, or-
Did you find that as you became more aware of the extent of the multiplicity, your system became comprised of fewer and fewer members?
The main question, in simple terms: Did fully realizing that you were part of a system create in any way MORE personalities or LESS personalities? Did this answer surprise you?
Any way you can find to answer these questions, any thoughts you have on this topic, or any way to revise this question would be of great help. This isn't for any sort of study, just my curiosity.
As always, this was not meant to be degrading in any way. I have a hard time explaining questions I have about multiplicity because I'm not a multiple, so bear with me.
- Laurr
Do you think this awareness "created" more personalities (allowed them to be born, or however you'd like to describe it), let personalities come out of the woodwork, stop being shadows, or-
Did you find that as you became more aware of the extent of the multiplicity, your system became comprised of fewer and fewer members?
The main question, in simple terms: Did fully realizing that you were part of a system create in any way MORE personalities or LESS personalities? Did this answer surprise you?
Any way you can find to answer these questions, any thoughts you have on this topic, or any way to revise this question would be of great help. This isn't for any sort of study, just my curiosity.
As always, this was not meant to be degrading in any way. I have a hard time explaining questions I have about multiplicity because I'm not a multiple, so bear with me.
- Laurr
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 12:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 12:28 am (UTC)Aware of more? Yes
We found that when each of us was willing to accept and respect our own multiplicity it was easier for different groups to meet and open up lines of communication. So people who thought their own little group was the extent of people here, had to reassess that when they met people from other groups. We had always been there, but there was a lot of hostility and fear that meant there was no real communication between groups
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 12:32 am (UTC)In some ways it created more maybe, and in some ways less.
What I mean is. There are about 41 people in our system, total. When it became apparent and undeniable that we were a We, there were a lot of us very near to the front, half our numbers, maybe more.
Now we have a pretty condensed rotation of at most 10 individuals normally. Usually two to five of us near the Front.
So... both, more and less...
And at the same time, the being aware of the state of being solidified many of us and at the same time cleared away many fragmented... echoes?
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 02:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 12:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 01:48 am (UTC)"Did fully realizing that you were part of a system create in any way MORE personalities or LESS personalities? Did this answer surprise you?"
It didn't create, but made me aware of how many there were. What took me a long time was allowing myself to recognize that what I was experiencing in terms of the gateway system wasn't just a "metaphor" for my own mental processes. Which, besides "oh you're just fantasizing", is the other thing you'll hear about people with large or complex inner/other/subjective worlds.
Also, *points to what
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 02:07 am (UTC)- Kat
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 02:20 am (UTC)Anyway, I do think that part of the reason it had gotten up to 1300 in numbers in here was because people were continually being "born" (we use that word usually now instead of created) after I found out about the first 12 or so.
(I should note that the words used here are mine and my beliefs for my system only and not everyone in here agrees with me on these subjects usually.)
sj
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 03:05 am (UTC)Azusa (who had been the 'dominant frontrunner' at the time when others first began to re-assert themselves) also had very strict rules for a while about who qualified as real and who didn't. For a while, anyone who seemed to be 'otherworldly,' or 'from a story,' she would consider to be not real, or at least not quite as real as those who seemed to have no personal history apart from this body. (Oddly, people who had never fronted before were also expected to be able to come up front and use the body instantly, or else *they* were considered to be 'just fragments.') We did eventually end up throwing out all those rules, but it took us a while to shake them off-- both the expectations of people and the idea that some were less real than others, and the idea that following the MPD model made one more real and valid.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 05:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 07:03 am (UTC)In the last couple years the system has been getting smaller due to a number of different things some of which were apparently beyond our control. She is glad it got smaller but not happy about the way some of it happened. She would like it to be even less people in here than there is now but she wont force anyone to leave so she just deals with it. Thankfully it is cooperative here now.
So the real answer to your question for us I would say is becoming aware that she was multiple and supposedly abused caused more people to be born. After accepting and dealing with being multiple for several years though, some of those people spontaneously left by choice.
lh
no subject
Date: 2005-11-07 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-08 03:27 pm (UTC)After a unsucsessful integration 6 years ago More showed up . Once again they said they had always been there just had not shown themselves till in a group. Tiea & Toni & Elaine
no subject
Date: 2005-11-10 08:52 am (UTC)