Hola

Mar. 2nd, 2005 07:10 pm
[identity profile] changelyng14.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] multiplicity_archives
My apologies for asking about a charged and likely tired subject, but there's something I need to know.
This isn't really something we are considering but it's about integration.

I've heard huge amounts of information about it, but the one and only question I care about gets me evasive fantastic-sounding answers that have little to do with, in my mind, the question.

If my system hired some quack to 'integrate' us, and he was successful. What EXACTLY will happen?
will I exist? Will my mates exist? will we really be this exciting 'blend' of all of us? or is that just what quacks tell splits to make splits like the idea?
I 'mix' with my mates quite alot, and the 'whatever' that we become is no more them then me. Is that what integration does?
Is it normal for a split to fear death in face of integration in the same way its 'normal' for a singlet to fear death when their head is on a chopping block?
Is a 'being' post-integrated a reliable source to explain what happened to them? Are there any post-integrates willing to explain what they've figured out about it in the sort of language I've gotten used to?

I'm very ignorant of this topic, I rarely find anything on the subject but things written to a singlet audience.

Thanks

Synch of Changelyng

Date: 2005-03-03 03:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
..... what makes you think the goal of shrinks is to make you normal? o.O

Date: 2005-03-03 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
.... LJ ate my reply. I'll try again later when that doesn't make me want to smash the monitor in.

I hate LJ.

(Short form: Psychologists are meant to cure disorders, not make you normal. Unfortunately the make you normal one is the one a lot of people thing is what it should be.)

Date: 2005-03-04 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Unfortunately the make you normal one is the one a lot of people thing is what it should be.)

Including far too many mental health professionals. The mental health industry is so politicized that their definitions of "normal" and "disorder" cannot be trusted.

Mental health professionals have always been in the business of making people normal in the sense that therapy is meant to help us adjust to societal norms, rather than the other way around. For a brief time in the 1960s and 70s, there was a movement in psychiatry against this type of thinking, but it fell by the wayside and became assimilated into the AHP, who are no longer taken seriously thanks to their toasterish extremes.

Date: 2005-03-04 07:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
It's crap I know. The ethical and logical defenitions of a good psychologist, and 'disorder' (which I often throw at people who go HEY YOU NEED HELP) are a lot different from what even the industry itself can make them out to be.

But it's still true to say that the (rare) psychologist who tries to help you function is the good shrink and the others are corrupt sick selfish bastards. More or less.

Technically you can still be 'abnormal' I think. For example they might try and help you control yourself not to burst into song in the middle of your work office, but they SHOULDN'T stop you doing it anywhere else. (Except where it classes of breach of the peace of course)



.... I sound terrible. This is why I shouldn't post in the mornings. Did my point get across?

Date: 2005-03-04 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Yes, it did, we understood exactly what you were saying. Jay used to clerk for a psychologist who fit your description of one who wouldn't stop you singing altogether, so we know they exist. This man did not believe in pathologising every quirk or eccentricity that came down the pipe; if he had, he'd have had to put himself in a straitjacket. And he'd be the first to tell you so. One key to his success was that he never took himself too seriously; his degree was not a mantle of infallibility, the way it is for too many.

Date: 2005-03-03 04:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sethrenn.livejournal.com
I may be paranoid but maybe brainwashing is a key part of integration? (not that some don't need their brains washed from time to time :p) but the two processes seem to have at least some in common.

You're not totally off. From what we've heard, the process of integration involves literally re-conditioning your way of thinking-- training you to think and react as a single person, rather than as many. A lot of older theories of integration saw it as being simply 'putting the broken pieces back together'-- the idea was that multiplicity was an unnatural state, and that the natural inclination of the mind was towards being a single person (even William James disputed this). If you could squeeze everyone together, the thinking went, the 'original self' would fuse like a broken bone.

What happens in reality, though, is that even a person who begins as a fragment of another can develop. Personality doesn't break up into all these little neatly defined pieces-- even if someone starts out only being capable of certain tasks or feeling certain emotions, if they spend enough time at front and have to change and develop in response to the challenges placed on them by the earth world, they can develop new skills, acquire the ability to feel a range of emotions. If they become capable of handling the body's life in their own right, the idea that they still need to be merged with others in order to be 'whole' becomes much more dubious.

thanks for the reply. heh, longer plz. Im sure ill be getting flamed soon for my length's tho.

You're fine. Nobody flames anyone else on this group-- it's in the community info. If you do, you get your post deleted and get warned by the mod, and then kicked off. If you're afraid your post is too long, you might want to put it behind an lj-cut.

Profile

multiplicity_archives: (Default)
Archives of the Livejournal Multiplicity Community

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 7th, 2025 04:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios