[identity profile] luciastorm.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] multiplicity_archives
Do you feel it is fair for the different alters to have partners or sexual activities while the 'main' (or meybe the one that is out most of the time) has a SO that they intend on being with for a long time..

I fell in love with my partner before i knew about the other personality (then about 2 years in i met a third personality) and i grew to love the 2nd personality (even though he is pretty mean sometimes!)
The third personality who i have known for about 6 months, i have also fallen for - he has aspects of the other two people that are just irresistable:P
Sadly he is in love with a girl that the main personality dated for a year or so (he never loved her - just liked the comfort of a stable relationship) and now im pretty confused about what to do. It would really hurt me for him to see her, not just because i love him too but because i feel that nobody else should be allowed to be with this body. He has asked for my hand in marraige and i dont want to share him!

I feel a bit selfish, but i know that if he were to contact the girl at all she would be back on his case again (she caused my SO a great deal of discomfort by constantly pestering and even calling in the middle of the night and waking him up) I have heard about a great deal of her plots to "steal" him back including trying to seduce him and getting herself pregnant. They havent seen each other for 4 years yet she cant let him get on with her life

I don't know what to do...i don't want to cause any of them any pain. I love them all but i don't know whether i should allow him to see her or beg him not to...i'm just really confused, please any assistance or just a point of view that is not my own would be greatly appreciated as i have no one at all i can confide in about this!!

xxxxLuciaxxxx

(by the way to avoid any confusion - i am a singlet and it is my partner who is a multiple)

Date: 2005-01-11 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luwana.livejournal.com
I suggest you join some poly communities and talk openly with all three of them about this. It has taken my mate some time to come to terms with Selene using my body for her own relationships, but he's ok with it.

Jealousy is not caused by someone else getting something. It's caused by someone else getting something *you aren't*. You need to negotiate to make sure YOUR NEEDS are fulfilled. Your need is likely not monogamy. Look past that. What are you frightened of.

Date: 2005-01-11 08:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luwana.livejournal.com
They have to know about each other if any of this is going to work. Otherwise it's going to get messy. Until they know of and accept each other this is NOT going to work.

There is your issue. The thought of losing him. This is what you're going to have to work on. What bothered my mate was the thought that he'd lose me. It has taken a long time for him to realise it's not going to happen. He used to have near panic attacks, there have been tears. But he's finally realised that I am still here, and I still love him, and that my or Selene's relationships with other people won't affect him and me.

It does take time. But you have to work through this WITH them.

Date: 2005-01-11 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luwana.livejournal.com
Before you get anything sorted, they really need to get their act together. Put the second one in therapy, do what it takes. Until they're completely functional there is going to be angst.

Date: 2005-01-12 12:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whispersong.livejournal.com
i have to agree with luwana on all of her statements. If this person, as you say, has this much control then your other two friends need to find a way to either negotiate or wrest control from him & move on. therapy i never advocate b/c i see no sense in it. shrugs thats just me though.

i will say this much: be strong & be willing to flex. If he is not willing to flex too though then your jobs harder & he is not fulfilling his obligation to you.

Fearing the loss of someone is understandable, i am mated to two people & yes i do wonder what i'd do w/out them, but i also realize i will go on if i lost one or both of them. There is no other way in life unfortunately.

{J}tatiana

Date: 2005-01-11 09:53 pm (UTC)
kiya: (Default)
From: [personal profile] kiya
If you're going to be in a multiple relationship situation, negotiate it up front and be clear on everyone involved's boundaries. Basically.

If one person isn't able to behave in good faith (like seems to be the case with #2 as described), find out how to control that person's potential for damage. In a singlet situation, common advice would be to not interact with that person, but that isn't feasable, so you'll have to find another way to handle it.

Date: 2005-01-12 01:42 am (UTC)
ext_77335: (Default)
From: [identity profile] iamshadow.livejournal.com
This doesn't sound so much like a relationship issue as a self-esteem issue for person #3. He seems to be seeking out this other girl deliberately, even though he knows she has hurt him in the past. That's a big sign of someone who doesn't respect themself enough, or doesn't respect their own right to be happy or be in a 'balanced' relationship.

Person #3 is deliberately seeking out a person who's a 'user' and a possessive, selfish one at that. From what is generally the 'type' in these situations, she's probably a not-so-subtle manipulator, who breaks him down, tells him what's wrong with how he is, and makes him believe that he can't exist or survive without her to 'support' him and clean up after his 'messes'. She probably sets him up to 'fail' by whittling away his self-belief and making him completely dependant, then reinforces his failure by using it as an example as to why he needs her.

For person #3 to even re-establish contact with this person without addressing his self-esteem and self-image issues would be a big mistake. The patterns and reactions she established in him are still there, even if inactive. Any re-establishment of contact, and he would fall back into them, come to 'heel' for her in a moment.

A book I found useful in building my self-esteem was Overcoming Depression by Paul Gilbert (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0195143116/qid=1105493831/sr=2-1/ref=pd_ka_b_2_1/104-7183527-6351113). It deals a lot with self-esteem issues (as a lot of seemingly non-causal depression is linked to self-image/esteem/belief) and helps you change the way you think about yourself and your abilities to deal with situations like the one you've described.

Amazon.com has it from as little as $6.95 used (not including postage). It's worth it, and it's a very good alternative to paying $100 an hour for therapy, which would probably deal with the same techniques (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) anyway. I found it quite empowering and self-esteem boosting to treat myself, as a matter of fact. I knew that it was *me* making the changes and taking control, and there wasn't that element of shame that many people feel if they have to seek any form of mental health treatment.

Date: 2005-01-12 02:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elenbarathi.livejournal.com
My honest opinion? You're probably not going to want to hear this, but I seriously doubt you've got any chance of a successful relationship with any of these three guys unless/until they all know about each other and start negotiating with one another.

"I can't talk openly with all three, i would then be betraying the trust of the third. (The other two dont know about him) but he is one of the most powerful and he has the most control over the other two."

Asking you to keep secret the existence of someone else who shares the same body is wrong - that's a "bad secret", one that causes harm to you and/or someone else. You are not under any obligation to keep bad secrets.

I say, if he won't make himself known to them so that you can talk openly with all three, it's best you end your relationships with them, and tell the two who don't know the truth about why you're doing so. Yeah, that's harsh, and I know you're scared, but the alternative is to go on living a lie until the whole situation blows up in your face.


Date: 2005-01-12 02:35 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
You are not under any obligation to keep bad secrets.

I disagree, but this is because I take trust obscenely seriously. A secret is a secret. Everybody is under obligation to keep secrets. The question is whether each individual feels that breaking that confidence, betraying that trust, is worth it. You in this case believe it would be. Others would not. It's all down to our individual morals.

Date: 2005-01-12 03:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elenbarathi.livejournal.com
Yes, it does. I believe that the moral obligation to avoid being a party to harmful acts outweighs the moral obligation to keep a secret.

Of course, I would not agree in the first place to keep a secret I felt was harmful. If someone I love was being controlled by a person about whom they knew nothing, I certainly wouldn't promise that person not to tell them. On the contrary, I'd be telling them at the earliest opportunity.

*shrugs* Type "bad secret" into Google; there are lots of sites explaining the difference between a secret it's right to keep and one that isn't.

Date: 2005-01-12 09:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
Technically hiding from others in a system is not a harmful act. It is only harmful if that person begins doing harmful things. Confusing, yes, maybe. But what if person number three cooked dinner. Did some of their work for them exceptionally well. While them being secret may bother many people, I can't say it wouldn't be unnerving, it isn't harmful until it poses a threat to the body's health/life/career/relationships.


My opinion may also be because 'if someone I loved' doesn't come into it for me. A person is a person is a person. Expressing bias in any way because you love them is... We just won't go there.


My point is that until person three starts doing rather extreme things, which as far as we can see, they haven't yet, talking to them and trying to convince them gently to come out themselves is likely the best option. Whether you would have made that promise or not (which again, we won't go into) this person HAS promised, it is done. Personally I think the one I'd be most worried about is the second personality. The third one is in love and that's about all any of us here know. Hardly harmful. Coaxing them out is a goal. Forcibly outing them is... just no. Not unless it was an absolute requirement for the safety and well being of the system.


But clearly we have different moral ground here.

Date: 2005-01-12 09:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elenbarathi.livejournal.com
Sounds pretty clear that she is being harmed by this secret:

"I feel like i'm fighting a losing battle sometimes.. the only thing that really holds me together his my love for him and his for me and my faith in god that he won't let him be pulled away from me."

"By the end of this rollercoaster it's going to be me that's in therapy!!"

This third person, of whom the other two know nothing, wants to resume a relationship with a former lover:

"i know that if he were to contact the girl at all she would be back on his case again (she caused my SO a great deal of discomfort by constantly pestering and even calling in the middle of the night and waking him up) I have heard about a great deal of her plots to "steal" him back including trying to seduce him and getting herself pregnant. They havent seen each other for 4 years yet she cant let him get on with her life"

I'd say it's pretty obviously harmful for him to make that decision without consulting the other two who share the body, at least one of whom has asked [livejournal.com profile] luciastorm to marry him.

*shrugs* If you don't feel people have greater obligations toward people they love than toward "any person", that's fine. I don't agree.

I thought we'd established pretty clearly last time (http://www.livejournal.com/community/multiplicity/161483.html) that our "moral ground" is quite drastically different. That person took your advice (http://www.livejournal.com/community/multiplicity/162970.html); this one may do the same... *shrugs*... everybody makes their own choices.

Date: 2005-01-12 10:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
"I feel like i'm fighting a losing battle sometimes.. the only thing that really holds me together his my love for him and his for me and my faith in god that he won't let him be pulled away from me."

You do realise that this quote was in reference to the second personality, who frankly appears to be the main issue here. While getting them all aware of each other *is a goal*, it would appear from how upsetting she finds him, that the second person and his attitude is what is causing the most angst and friction. If that person is dealt with, it's entirely possible the third will feel more comfortable about coming out. As is, he has made no move to actually yet go against the wishes of the other two involved, which means it's entirely possible he can be reasoned with.

There are other, more contructive ways to go about this than just breaking someone's trust. That should be a last resort, not the first thing you do. If you really love someone then wouldn't you try to take the most gentle and careful route to ensure all your loves came out happy, rather than just doing the equivilant of smacking them about with a blunt instrument?

(My comment about people we love is, if for example, Kinjou, my mate, was being a dick, and was clearly wrong, I would not say that he was right. I wouldn't put any kind of heavy bias on him just because he is my mate. If he's wrong he's wrong.)

Date: 2005-01-12 10:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
(btw, since you bring up our last little discussion, I took my own advice as well. I haven't cut in months. There was no angst involved in this. I didn't have to go for walks or listen to pretty classical music or voulenteer at any shelters. I did the most logical thing. I managed to fix the problem that caused my desire to cut. And until I achieved that, cutting kept me sane, kept me rational. Fighting the urges would have crippled me. I know, I tried. Cutting is not the problem. It never is, unless a person's life is at risk. The problem always is and always will be that which causes the urge.

Like I said. Not an addiction. Merely a coping method.)

Date: 2005-01-12 04:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chezames.livejournal.com
We are in a similar situation, altho We are the multiple ones. Cassie was, and still is, in love with DQ. But he is in another state so we never see him. Right before We met my (Lynn) fiance, Cristie had fallen in love with PK. It was a bad relationship and could not work. But she still loves him and when she talks to him on the phone she just wants him so bad. My fiance doesn't want him to know about "us" becuz he's afraid that PK will see that as an oportunity to win Cristie back.

As to if We think it's fair for members of a system to see other people when one is in a long term relationship, no, not for us. We agreed long ago that if We met a guy that loves us all and We decided as a system to have a long term relationship with this person, that it would be monogamous. So this is what we did with Keith, my fiance. Cassie and Cristie talk to their loves, but they know it can never be and are OK with that (most of the time!). Keith is *semi* OK with them talking to their loves, as long as it's not done in secret. However, this is just us, We know other systems that are different.

Date: 2005-01-12 06:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowechoes.livejournal.com
First, I would acknowledge them all as separate people, each as individuals instead of "alters" or "personalities". Just like individuals who don't share one body have rights as individuals, so do people in a multiple system. The other members of your SO's system have just as much a right as your SO to have their own relationships, even sexual ones.

That said, I can see where you're coming from. We're married to another multiple system, and almost all of Us are involved with different members of Their system. However if any of Them were to want a relationship outside Our system.. it'd be very hard for Us to deal with, even though We recognize each of Them as individuals and that They have rights as such. At least there are plenty of Us for Them to be with.

I think you need to have a talk with your SO and the others in your system. This particular other woman sounds like bad news for Person #3, as well as the other two in the system. But perhaps you all could discuss openly about the others having healthy relationships and making sure that your needs and concerns would be met still by your SO in the system. Perhaps they can all agree to have monogamy with the body - each having individual relationships with just you. But be prepared for other members of the system wanting to pursue their own SOs.

Good luck.

~Jordan

Date: 2005-01-12 07:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mysticeden.livejournal.com
I'm just wondering about you falling in love wiht one of your personalities? whats up?

Joe

Date: 2005-01-12 08:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
I thought she said that at first too. She meant falling in love with other personalities in her mate's body.

Date: 2005-01-12 09:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mysticalunicorn.livejournal.com
Ah okay. What i thought at first was kinda creepy.

joe

Date: 2005-01-12 09:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
Falling in love with a member of your own system is creepy? o.O

Date: 2005-01-12 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mysticalunicorn.livejournal.com
well at least in our system most people are like family so it would be like dating my sister...=S

Joe

Date: 2005-01-12 08:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ques-nova.livejournal.com
I find that for multiples who have very strong others (as in ones who front frequently and for extended amounts of time) polyamory is the best approach.
My others are allowed to pursue other relationships (with those I'm involved with or other people) so long as everyone is open and honest about it.

Date: 2005-01-12 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ramlatch.livejournal.com
I think unless you two are going to be okay with a polyamorous relationship then bluntly the best thing is to just tell the third that she's bad news for the entire group of you and that's that.

Good luck :/

Date: 2005-01-13 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
-I wasn't going to say anything, but I'm just briefly going to say my piece:

It isn't that an open relationship can't work. We were in an open relationship with a singlet male for years -- both of us free to see other people, and we did.

My concern is not with that. If you want to work out something like that with your husband&, that's fine. But that girl is bad news. We've known women like that and it will not get better. You are right to tell her to get lost. Do it, and make sure it sticks. Get a restraining order on her if you have to.

This sounds like a classic conning and manipulation situation between the different people in your husband's group. #2 uses #1, this girl uses #1 to get to #3... and don't be too sure #1 isn't doing a bit of manipulation on his own. People who feel powerless often do, even with the best of intentions.

Someone in that house needs to get a handle on their household management issues before everything goes to hell. It sounds like it's already well on its way there.

Pay attention to what [livejournal.com profile] elenbarathi has told you. These fellows must start communicating, and they must do something about #2's vicious nature. From your description he's one of those "angry protector" blokes who thinks he's doing it for everybody's own good. He's got to understand he's hurting the very people he seeks to protect. Real protectors help and strengthen the more vulnerable ones, and he won't do that by being a harsh punishing disciplinarian.

Date: 2005-01-13 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
... *fucking gives up* Elenbarathi who totally ignored #2 as any kind of issue, instead acting like the world was going to end because #3 was shy.

I give up, I really do.

Date: 2005-01-13 03:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
#3 was not just shy -- he was contemplating taking up with a woman who is known to be devious and manipulative, posing a serious threat to the group's existing relationship with [livejournal.com profile] luciastorm. In a situation like that, #3 keeping himself secret from the other two is a bad idea since his decision will affect their lives. I brought up #2 in this post (I was going to address that more fully in a comment to another of her posts) because I'm guessing part of the reason #3 doesn't want to be revealed is that he's afraid of #2.

It's [livejournal.com profile] luciastorm's decision what to do next, and her husband&'s decision to establish 3-way communication. Lucia already says she's decided to tell the girl to get lost, and to recommend to #3 that he reveal himself to the others -- and it's his decision to do that. Let's see what she tells us after she does these things.

Date: 2005-01-13 03:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
Contemplating, heh, wow. I've complated such things before, wished they could happen. But I never actually did them no matter how much I wanted to. Hell I've seriously contemplated a lot worse than that, nothing ever came of it. From what Lucia has been saying, #3 is relatively harmless, he's not malicious, he's controlable. I object to the way elenbarathi flew off as if she had to grass him up NOW or the sun would go nova. There is no immediate threat here from #3, and dumping him in it is possibley the most harmful way to handle the situation.

Sorry, I just get bitchy when people who are being ignorant and smug are treated like every word they say is perfect and complete. It happens in most communities at some point or other (and it's usually me that ends up speaking out. Thus I am a trouble maker. Apparently.)

Date: 2005-01-13 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Well, that's between you and elenbarathi -- my main focus here is on [livejournal.com profile] luciastorm and what she needs to do if she wants to stay in this relationship with these guys. I've got my own opinion on what I would do if we were in such a relationship but that's me and not Lucia.

As for me I'm glad you're in this community, all different opinions are necessary.

Date: 2005-01-13 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
I have known people like #2 before -- some of them persons in multiple systems, some singlets. I do understand what he's like. You cannot go on appeasing him like that -- it is detrimental to you. Healthy relationships are not about who wins and who loses, who's weak and who's strong.

That is a very bad scene you are in.

Profile

multiplicity_archives: (Default)
Archives of the Livejournal Multiplicity Community

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 12th, 2026 02:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios