(no subject)
Jan. 18th, 2004 01:10 amHow do the rest of you deal with issues of free will that could potentially affect the entire system via the body? Smoking, in specific. Should people be allowed to smoke if they choose, even if they share the body with non-smokers?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-17 11:32 pm (UTC)Other things though, We don't allow. We don't allow any illegal drugs or anything else that would be really self-harming, like self-mutilation. Part of it also has to do with legal consequences.
~Bones
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 12:03 am (UTC)~Bones
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 12:10 am (UTC)*wry grin* He's somewhat better about making healthy food choices too, just because he doesn't really like most prepared food - he has no interest in milk, cheese, bread, pasta, or any sort of sauces or condiments. He'll eat rice or oatmeal on occasion, but mostly he likes fruit, raw or lightly-steamed veggies, and very rare meat. He'd eat it raw if we let him, but we don't, because of the health hazard, so except for sushi and the occasional steak, he's mostly vegetarian.
Food is one of Duathir's "corporeality issues", and on the rare occasions he takes the helm, he prefers not to deal with eating at all. He says he doesn't mind smoke, though he has no desire to do it himself, but Crist-Erui shouldn't have to put up with it. He's right, of course, so I try to be considerate about it.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 03:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-17 11:44 pm (UTC)I can't use smoking as a good example; even second-hand smoke does unpleasant things to the body no matter who's driving for us. (Asthma attack, as far as we can tell.) But I can probably come up with a couple of other things that might work.
I haven't personally had any disputes of type "I want to do X" vs. "I don't want to be in a body that does X". Mostly what I have are things some folks find questionable (recreational chemistry of various forms, tattooing, and so on) that some in the system are interested in and everyone else is more or less neutral on. Since there aren't any actual objections being raised, those are things that I feel fine pursuing.
I can imagine dealing with the some-for and some-against thing. I imagine what I'd do now that I'm selves-aware would be to sort out what the arguments for and against that particular thing are, and either talk out my conflicts with someone I trust outside the system or find someone within the system who can be trusted to judge the matter from a rationalist standpoint rather than an emotional one.
I can also see the possibility of giving people veto powers, or negotiating limits on behaviours ("Okay, you can each smoke, but not more than N cigs a day" or "no cigs, but you can smoke herbal/cloves" or "pipes only" or what have you), or any of a number of other compromise situations.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 12:51 am (UTC)Things like smoking really have to be negotiated about, because there are health factors, and it's something that not just going to affect the person who does it. Maybe only smoking lower mg cigs, rationing cigs per day, or negotiating times when the smokers can smoke that isn't going to piss off the non-smokers are options you could look at as a group.
Glad we didn't have to go through that though. The only member we've ever had who smoked was only around for about six months when we were in our late teens bodywise, and she had her smokes in the headspace, not using the body.
Not that we would have had the guts to go buy real ones - at that time we were still living at home *coughprisoncough* and were forced into attending church *coughbrainwashingcough* and were so shit-scared of the world outside that talking to strangers was a bit of a hike. Buying cigerettes underage was *way* out of our league.
Ruth & co.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 02:17 am (UTC)In our case, only the two of us who are smokers actually identify the body as "mine". The others look nothing like the body, so they treat the issue much like second hand smoke, as someone mentioned above.
As a group, we worry a lot more about things that have a more dramatic effect on the mind than about the things that have effects on the body.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 09:41 am (UTC)The closest thing for us would probably be food alergies. Among us, we have an impressive array of different allergies and sensitivities. A few (such as coconut) are so serious that no one's allowed to overrule, but for the most part, people are allowed to eat what they want as long as they stick around long enough afterward to make sure it gets digested. That means Brigid has to make sure her jalopenos don't give us heartburn, Enrico waits so his mushrooms don't make us nauseous, etc.
Does that help?
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 03:48 pm (UTC)Daetrieas
no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 04:02 pm (UTC)It's not just hearsay either. A friend of my mothers was diagnosed with emphysema. Her doctor told her she had to quit smoking. She'd never smoked. Turns out the damage had been done by her husband's secondary smoke - and he'd been dead for twenty years.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 08:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-01-18 06:33 pm (UTC)With smoking in particular or anything physically addictive, I think it is hard - because it not only impacts on your body health-wise (smell-wise, taste-wise, lung capacity-wise, all of which will affect other people's enjoyment of their lives) but it forms a *body* habit that may be hard on others. Also it can be expensive and that requires negotiation on the economic front.
None of us actually smokes but I think if someone wanted to, we would settle on a very very low number of cigarettes per month, like one. Enough to respect their desire without triggering a life dependency.
no subject
Date: 2004-01-20 08:09 am (UTC)I personally think that anything that affects everyone should be carefully decided upon. Especially something permanent. All of my tattoos I got before I knew I was multiple and the same with being married and having a child. Some of my alters don't like that but they "deal" with it. We're trying to decide what we're going to do about it though since some of them would like to have a lover of their own. Something I'm not entirely comfortable with and neither is my husband. But, we're trying to find a compromise.
Anything illegal isn't allowed for obvious reasons. I don't want to wind up in jail or something. Something like shopping is difficult because we all have different tastes (something I figured out yesterday while shopping). We don't have a lot of money so We can't just spend.
It's one of those things, I think, that really depends on the individual system.