Existential Multiple Flamewar!
Jun. 27th, 2007 06:33 pmThings have been a bit heavy here, so I offer up this word game as a contribution where everyone can be as clever, unclever, silly or whatever. This is an Existential Flamewar...just post a reply in the theme of the post above you. I'll start.
***********************
Rambly rant posted at three AM on Monday night, broken into paragraphs and obviously the work of several members of the posting System. It complains about lack of content to read on the Internet, cold feet, bad coffee and misbehaving cats, and somehow comes around to blaming all this on People Who Pretend To Be Multiple, Damn Them. Then the original poster apologizes profusely for system mates and proclaims that bed is needed.
Next?
***********************
Rambly rant posted at three AM on Monday night, broken into paragraphs and obviously the work of several members of the posting System. It complains about lack of content to read on the Internet, cold feet, bad coffee and misbehaving cats, and somehow comes around to blaming all this on People Who Pretend To Be Multiple, Damn Them. Then the original poster apologizes profusely for system mates and proclaims that bed is needed.
Next?
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 10:48 pm (UTC)Accusation of prejudiced and meeeeean viewpoint that is not even implied by the original post.
Lengthy statement of completely unrelated gripe about the multiple community. Conclusion by generalization that this proves something derogative about people in general.
Poorly spelled, grammar-free expression by the system's little, requesting ice cream.
Admission that the system is drunk, and totally irrelevant excuse for why this is so.
Threat to quit the community and start a new one with all our friends. Statement of irrelevant criteria proving our system is much better than yours in every way.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 10:51 pm (UTC)Denial that the system is drunk, and besides it's none of your business anyway.
Multi-paragraph dissertation on why the lil should not have ice cream now.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 10:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 11:00 pm (UTC)Many emoticons that look like this: O.o
Flame on! Blue Jello!
100th post!
I'm a drunken whore! Boobies!
Member banned for boobies.
Protest about banning.
Thread hijacked for boobie macros.
Thread deleted.
New thread started about the deletion of the previous thread.
Someone mentions littles having sex. Flame On!
Lovers spat occurs publicly. Suspicions confirmed. Shit thrown.
...no one can remember the original post.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 11:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 11:15 pm (UTC)I HAS A BOOBIES
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 11:41 pm (UTC)LeAnne
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 12:27 am (UTC)...I got the referrence! Yay!
existential multiple flamewar
Date: 2007-06-27 11:50 pm (UTC)heh heh
polly people (viola, shell, calypso, just jo, mannie, thea, Cat etc.)
Re: existential multiple flamewar
Date: 2007-06-28 02:47 am (UTC)Re: existential multiple flamewar
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-27 11:51 pm (UTC)Comment that at least cats don't chew through wood or have voices that hit 40 decibels.
Random caffeine-induced Invader-Zim joke nobody probably gets.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 12:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 12:46 am (UTC)Is later discovered to be a sock puppet journal. Oh noes!
This was a good idea; cookies for all.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 01:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 02:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 02:45 am (UTC)Heatedly insists that I Is Real Multiple
Gets sidetracked into discussion of diagnoses
at which point reply is hijacked by headmate
who couches fury and touchy inferiority complex in such English phrasing that only another Englishman will realise that the OP has been in any way insulted.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 03:20 am (UTC)-J
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 03:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 03:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 03:20 am (UTC)We'd never done one of these before and it makes us smile. Thank you!!!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 03:46 am (UTC)Totally unrelated response to another point in the original post, clearly written by one of the system members who has received replies that seem to warrant responses.
And now, the vampire emoticons:
(f;.;)f
.......(f;.;)f
..............(f;.;)f
I chase you and drink your BLOOD!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 01:22 pm (UTC)flounce
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 04:15 am (UTC)comment #36! woot! ♥
LeAnne
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 08:47 am (UTC)Posts a picture of a jello molded oval shape with ambrosia in the middle.
Blue Jello.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 09:13 am (UTC)Watch out, that's stuff's almost radioactive!
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 01:23 pm (UTC)long post about how no one really gets it and all I wanted was to be heard and don't yous like me and then 30 more replies about how we all love you and then 30 more cat macro!!!
and a bunny with a pancake on her head.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 04:38 pm (UTC)Optional: Inadvertent restarting of the entire flame war thanks to a careless word or typo.
Optional #2: Discovery that commenter is not a multiple, despite des never having claimed to be, resulting in acrimonious accusations of treachery, conspiracy and FBI/CIA/Home Office/SixApart espionage.
Optional #3: More acrimony as commenter does not treat spying allegations with due seriousness and instead posts a dog macro claiming to be in somebody's Aston Martin passionately embracing their Bond girl.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-28 08:01 pm (UTC)LeAnne
no subject
Date: 2007-06-29 07:55 am (UTC)Tells OP that Wikipedia knows everything, and that they should have looked it up.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2007-06-29 08:54 am (UTC)~Cutesy little-type sign-off, possibly misspelled
no subject
Date: 2007-06-30 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-08-02 03:56 pm (UTC)FTW!