Hello

Apr. 5th, 2007 11:46 am
[identity profile] dragonsilver.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] multiplicity_archives

Hello.

I'm an 18 yr old female and I have MPD. We are functional, except for the little *coughs* in the system. I am dating a 23 yr old male who is simply amazing. I have recently confided in him about the MPD, and he as expected took it greatly.(His best friend also has MPD)

Because of the fact this is a relationship between a singleton and a multiple, and I have little to no prior experiance with this I am looking for some help on how to make this work without making it awkward. The last thing I want is problems due to this. 

One of my alters is male, and in no way gay, and hates even holding hands with my boyfriend when he is fronting. This is the main reason this was confided into him-to go from touchy me to 'get your hands off of me' me I could tell was confusing the boyfriend. This alter has a bad temper and is very protective/possessive towards me, and can barely tolerate the boyfriends presence. My question for the alter is how can he politely tell the boyfriend to stop touching him-before he goes into a rage and intentionally hurts him. The alter has only been well behaved for the deals we have made for his good behaviour-however his patience for this little game is waning.

Any tips would be greatly appretiated.

Thank you for your time.

"Cassie-original to the body"
"Jake-the alter with the problem"

Date: 2007-04-05 04:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
Communication is the key. Telling your boyfriend what is up is a good
start. ...I would suggest that you have a talk with Jake too.

Oh, not to give you a hard time, but the term 'Alter' is offensive to
many other plural people who consider themselves full persons ;-)

Toni of Mtribe

PS - my boyfriend really only dates one of us.

Date: 2007-04-05 04:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
It seems to me that the only acceptable solution would be to not have
Jake front when you are with your boyfriend. My boyfriend *abhors* kids
so we try to make sure the kids know to leave front when he is coming
around.

Like any relationship it is based on communication and compromise, except
in this care there are at least 3 people who have to be satisfied with
the solution.

--- Toni of Mtribe

Date: 2007-04-05 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
"Headmates" works.

Johnny

Date: 2007-04-05 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tej-agni.livejournal.com
It's okay to call them what you'd like to. If everyone's happy with it then it's fine. :)

-Butterfly

Date: 2007-04-05 09:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
...Then they should not front when you are with your boyfriend. When they are
doing their things they can front, when you do your things you front.

Talk to them, ok ? See what they have to say about it. Maybe you can work out
some solution.

--- Miri of Mtribe

Date: 2007-04-05 11:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
"My other 'personalities'(what would be a good non-offensive term?)"

People? Or what do they call themselves? Ask them.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-04-05 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tej-agni.livejournal.com
I agree with you.

-Butterfly

Date: 2007-04-06 09:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phen0type.livejournal.com
Agreed as well. I noted in my comment that it is often considered offensive, but my general principle is to allow people to be called whatever they want to be called, even though it may personally offend others.

Date: 2007-04-05 09:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
When we were first working to be functional our companion/wife stood up for
a couple people in our system that the rest of us were embarrassed about.
That ended up being the most important bit of advice we had with regards
to getting along.

Not trying to dump on anyone. Just trying to help ;-)

--- Miri of Mtribe
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-04-05 10:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
With all due respect, please step off the high horse.

No one is dictating anything to anyone. Just a suggestion.

As far as worrying about talk damaging anyone - please note
that this is a discussion group, not a theraputic group.

Again - we have no more authority than you do in telling people
how to define their terms.

--- Marina of Mtribe
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-04-05 10:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
Dr, your degree does not grant you authority here. After a long day of work
we are not up to debating MPD theory with you or anyone else.

I do have the right to say what was helpfull for us. Having someone stand up
for a couple of littles in our system made the difference between having a
functioning system and not. And i DO have the right to say what worked for US.

I beg you to look at what we have written and show how we defined anyone. Since
you are a student dr i also have to say that arrogance has turned many away from
respecting your field. I speak from a personal perspective here.

Anyway, Chill out. You are accusing us of writing things we did not write.

--- Marina of Mtribe
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-04-05 11:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
Lol - Bias - Well that was in the past before i married a psychiatrist ;-) I agree
that folks should be able to use their own terminology but as a freewheeling
community folks will say what they will say. I would not argue with anyone in the
theraputic communities.

Anyway i think we can BOTH call this argument as a case of overwork causing
irritability. Pardon me. We are the Mtribe and i am Marina. Pleased to meet you.

--- Marina of Mtribe

PS - know i gave my wife as hard a much harder time about MPD theories than you
here. One of these days we should actually write the arguments down.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-04-05 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
Cool.

A while ago i asked my old wife/partner if all dr's were arrogant.

Her answer was - only the good ones.

That is true about unix administrators too.

--- Marina of Mtribe
(deleted comment)

Date: 2007-04-05 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
It must be hard dealing with collegues. Our partner does not get along with many
of her collegue as well. She, like my uncle is willing to go to war over patient
care quality. Both of them have made a lot of enemies that way.

What that community psychiatrist said makes little sense. For the longest time we
did not work in the past as we got better through zen buddhism (via Marsha
Linehan). Even in a purly biological sense what that dr said made no sense as it
is proven that past injuries contribute to present problems.

Anyway, have a good night. We are going to curl up with a book.

--- Miri and Marina of Mtribe

Date: 2007-04-08 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Oh, dear God.

Has the woman been able to find real help anywhere?

Date: 2007-04-05 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
It has to be what's right for you & co. We're pro-choice on integration, and if they want to be called parts, then that is what we will call them.

"People should be allowed to define their terms and write their own rules for how they choose to interact within the body and outside of it."

Amen.

Date: 2007-04-06 01:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weirdiguess.livejournal.com
Glad someone's saying it. It gets pretty annoying when everybody's saying to call them 'people' and not belittle them, but hey, I say call a spade a spade if the spade isn't bothered by it.

Not like she called the rest of us alters, that might be something to let her know can be offensive.

Date: 2007-04-06 02:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
Seriously, I read that as Toni informing Cassie of a term Toni didn't think she knew. Sometimes people use unpopular terms about themselves because they feel they're accurate, which is perfectly fine, but sometimes they use them because they don't know any others. Learning the right words for stuff really helped me get my head on straight about Johnny. Maybe it could have been put better, but I say hooray for vocabulary lessons.

Rob

Date: 2007-04-06 02:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weirdiguess.livejournal.com
Well, my bad I guess. I figured if that's what they'd meant, that's what they would've said. I just saw them saying alters was offensive to a lot of people, when the OP didn't call anybody alters. Sounded to me like she was bothered about offense, not whether the shoe fit. It's just what I saw. My bad if I read it wrong.

Date: 2007-04-06 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
Or maybe I'm the one who's wrong. I was just thinking that if someone had said something like that to me when I first got here, Johnny would have said "No kidding" and I would have learned something new and valuable. (My actual term was "imaginary friend" not "alter," but the point holds.) On the other hand, I can see where that statement might be read as something bad. *shrugs*

Rob

Date: 2007-04-05 04:35 pm (UTC)
pthalo: a photo of Jelena Tomašević in autumn colours (Default)
From: [personal profile] pthalo
I dunno, what if Jake would say "Hi, it's me, Jake" or something if he shows up when the boyfriends around, or if the boyfriend shows up when he's around? Then the boyfriend would know "okay, that means no kissing/touching" and it's a polite thing to say and can be said before anything happens that might be a problem.

Date: 2007-04-05 04:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] katullus.livejournal.com
The problem seems a difficult one to face for the rest of your life, but not unsurmountable. I reiterate only what's been said before- communication is key.

Date: 2007-04-05 04:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weirdiguess.livejournal.com
Could just say "Hey, it's [name]" or warn him "[name]'s coming out". That way he knows how to deal with it, doesn't have to get told to keep his hands off.

Date: 2007-04-05 05:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] linnai.livejournal.com
For us, both of our significant others (one is a system like we are, the other is a singlet male) are well aware of us as individuals and do their best to respect each person. The other system is better at telling us apart and respecting each individual person's boundaries, but the singlet isn't doing bad. He spends more time trying to coax his girlfriend out, but that's understandable too.

Date: 2007-04-05 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teh-kerry.livejournal.com
Just to reiterate what everyone else said, communication will be important here, but there's no point us repeating what everyone else said, so we'll leave it. (They probably said it better anyway).

As we're only involved with another system, who tend to understand how we want to be treated as individuals, we don't have many problems with understanding. Although there are problems with people changing, and other people not noticing - Liam's gay, and he's ended up kissing Nadine, who's a lesbian (mostly), because Liam thought it was still his boyfriend. But all of this can, as others have said, be solved by communication. (Just be prepared to be asked who it is every 2 minutes... we were guilty of that, at the start, when the other system we know 'came out' to us).

Also, on a completely unrelated note, Lynn's kids are called Cassie and Jack. (I doubt highly that that's relevant, but I thought you might like to know :D)

- Kerry

Date: 2007-04-05 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sethrenn.livejournal.com
Well, to add to what everyone else here has said, we personally have had problems in the past with SOs who didn't get it about not everyone in the system being equally hands-on. This one guy basically believed that because he was dating "the main person" (or what we were all desperately trying to pretend was a main person, anyway), then he was having a relationship with everyone else in the group, and could basically hit on anyone.

If someone I didn't much care for tried to kiss up to me because I was sharing a body with someone he was dating, I probably would shove him off. If he tried groping me, I'd probably whap him. Some people really just have a hard time getting their head around the idea that everyone in the body is not "part of so-and-so, therefore they're with me too."

~Y.

Date: 2007-04-05 09:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tej-agni.livejournal.com
I don't know what I'd do in this situation. It's hard sometimes to have everyone like everyone else. Maybe you can ask Jake for the reasons why he doesn't like your boyfriend. It could be a reason other than jealousy. Maybe he sees something about him that you don't? I don't know. I hope something can be worked out for all of you. Hug.

-Butterfly

Date: 2007-04-06 09:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phen0type.livejournal.com
Hello, and welcome to the community.

Is it possible that you can try and negotiate with Jake about this? I think it would be appropriate to approach him as you would any other person and talk to him about this.

Best wishes,
Richard

Date: 2007-04-06 09:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phen0type.livejournal.com
And yes, as Toni of [livejournal.com profile] catskillmarina said, it is more appropriate to refer to people within multiple or plural groups as people, rather than alters. It's considered offensive by many, including me and the rest of my group.

Regards,
Richard (who really should have included this in his other comment)

Date: 2007-04-07 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weirdiguess.livejournal.com
Did she call you an alter? This was kinda my point to people above. I double checked, I didn't see her calling the rest of the community alters. How she talks about her own group is her business, if it's what she wants.

Date: 2007-04-08 12:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] phen0type.livejournal.com
I shall concede that, I suppose. I wasn't meaning to censure her usage and I shan't start a debate about the merits of the term. I don't care to use it myself.

Date: 2007-04-06 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
Anyway - welcome to the community. Sorry we sparked a debate that created much
smoke and little light.

--- Miri of Mtribe

Date: 2007-04-09 03:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catskillmarina.livejournal.com
It was communication that allowed us to function.

The first year after we seriously split or realized our
split was rough but it was so worth it working on the
communications and stuff like that.

We did a lot of journaling back then and we got a very
good therapist to work with us.

--- Miri of Mtribe

Profile

multiplicity_archives: (Default)
Archives of the Livejournal Multiplicity Community

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 04:40 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios