[identity profile] underlankers.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] multiplicity_archives
Dunno how much good this review will do, as I didn't pay attention during most of the episode, but there was an episode of Psych that featured a male multiple. The portrayal was kinda bad. Kept up stereotype of "no-one knows anything about each other", and the infamous Male=Criminal stereotype. The system in question had three selves. The boring host, the woman named Regina and a possible soulbond named Martin Brody. The system was preparing to undergo gender reassignment surgery, and of course, one self killed the doctor another was seeing about it. The fake psychic this show is about figures it all out, and it ends with the multiple in the company of the Nice Men in White CoatsTM. Poor portrayal. Kept one system member laughing all night. So, without further ado, discuss.

Date: 2006-08-21 10:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chaostiny.livejournal.com
Even if you didnt pay attention to much of the episode, you got it right:) I giggled hysterically throughout the whole episode partially due to the fact that I figured out the plot right away and it was way cheesy! But, I did enjoy it just for the laugh!

Date: 2006-08-22 03:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] exsillium-nocte.livejournal.com
I do feel kinda bad, because two or three of our system members are (or at least started out as) the stereotypical male criminal thing... Though Jack and Umbrian Reiori still kind of are, Malachai has grown up a lot (although he is still REALLY GOOFY).

Date: 2006-08-22 03:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] exsillium-nocte.livejournal.com
Hah. Hah. Hah. Shut up, Matthew.

~Chai

Date: 2006-08-22 04:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sethrenn.livejournal.com
*boggles* What station is this show on? (And would you want to do a more detailed review of this for Pavilion?)

Date: 2006-08-23 01:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kangetsuhime.livejournal.com
Discuss the drama that best serves television ratings?

Because that's all it is.

Date: 2006-08-23 01:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
I dunno, I don't see any reason a sympathetic multiple couldn't be popular. There's some subtle but definite elements of multiplicity in Kingdom Hearts 2, and that's hardly an obscure game that didn't make much money. The multiplicity is fantasized, of course, to fit the setting, but it's a positive, non-stereotypical treatment.

Date: 2006-08-23 02:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] weirdiguess.livejournal.com
I mean, they don't *pull in the ratings*. You can see multiples in things, generally not pointed out so a lot of it is speculation, but you typically won't find a show *about* a multiple that doesn't have major negative spin, or doesn't make them a big freak show.

That's how TV works. It's why dead little white blonde girls in football shirts get the front page, whereas a middle age average working class murdered man gets a short mention somewhere around page 7.

~us

Date: 2006-08-23 04:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Toya Currie (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20020210/ai_n12452509) didn't even get that, except in the Afro-American press. She was attacked the same day as JonBenet. The only reason the mainstream press and CNN picked it up was because one of the Afro-American journalists covering her story wrote to the Sun-Times criticizing them for their huge coverage of JBR while paying no attention to a similar story occurring on the same day within the city.

It isn't that writers won't write sympathetic multiple characters. I am certain that they have done so. The problem is that no producer or studio will touch it.

For one thing, NAMI would have to approve the script, and they would leave their sticky fingerprints all over it. Remember what they did to Ron Howard over A Beautiful Mind? He was forced to insert a line into the script saying that John Nash had been "put on a new medication". Far be it from NAMI to permit the truth, which is that Nash taught himself to discern and ignore hallucinations, and taught his son to do the same.

Date: 2006-08-24 01:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cirape.livejournal.com
I'm not certain where you see multipicity in Kindgom Hearts 2. Explain.

--A

Date: 2006-08-24 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
It's pretty spoilery. I'd rather put it behind a link. Is it worth a separate entry? Or do you just want me to email you or something?

Re: Review for Pavilion.

Date: 2006-08-24 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Works for me.

Geez, what a bunch of s--t.

Date: 2006-08-24 02:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cirape.livejournal.com
I've played through the whole game, and I'm at a loss to see any multiplicity there. You can be vauge and I'll get it, or do what you want.

--A

Date: 2006-08-24 02:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
Vague? Um... Roxas, after you leave Twilight Town.

Like I said, it's subtle. It took me a while to make the connection, and I couldn't tell you if the writers knew they were writing about something real. But it was similar enough to Johnny and me to touch a nerve.

Date: 2006-08-24 02:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cirape.livejournal.com
I think you're displacing.
Its a common occurance that when you want to see something hard enought, you'll see it. You want to see Roxas as an example as a healthy multiple? Or perhaps you just wanted to see an example somewhere.
From a literary standpoint, the duality of man has been used over and over again. Pointing out Roxas and his Other as that is far more likely. And one does not need to have more than one person in their head to have more than one side to them.
If you /have/ to see Roxas and his Other as a multiple system, they're far from healthy at the end either. There's that whole integration thing again.

I think any signs of multiplicity in Kingdom Hearts are only from the player using their own experances to color the game.
|Which might be part of the experiance...I guess.|

--A
|And Diz|

Re: Review for Pavilion.

Date: 2006-08-24 02:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
http://www.karitas.net/pavilion/library/articles/m_review_psych0806.html

thank you.
*headdesk*

Date: 2006-08-24 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksol1460.livejournal.com
Couple of friends of ours (one plural, one not) have observed the same thing about what could be seen as multiplicity in Kingdom Hearts II. But they say that to them, it has to do with the Nobodies. The way these guys see it: The nobodies are looking for somewhere to exist because they've been told over and over again that they're not real, that they have no feelings and that they are only pretend. They are told they are not allowed to exist on their own, but must reintegrate with their origins because both are only 'half a person' otherwise.

Date: 2006-08-24 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cirape.livejournal.com
No, Nobodies are told they're not a person at all. And while its possible some might be looking for a place to exist, Nobodies are just looking for a heart. Not a system, not an integration--not that 'reintegration' is possible for most Nobodies anyway, if you look at how they're created.
Its really stretching to see us as a metaphor for multiples.

--A

Date: 2006-08-24 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
One, I didn't say healthy. I said sympathetic. They've got some serious issues - actually, they're almost completely non-communicative, and there's hints of deeper problems. But they're both good guys. And they did not integrate in the sense we use the term, that's clear in the ending.

Two, they're two distinct people in the same body. I don't see how you can argue with that. They have separate friends, and distinct memories, and different skills. They have dialogue at one point. It's more than can be explained away as a metaphor about the duality of man.

Date: 2006-08-24 03:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cirape.livejournal.com
Again, displacement.
There's little argument that the two share a body at the end, for however long it lasts. The game does not stand as an example as multiplicity. If you want to write that correlation, you might as well state that 'The Exorcist' is an example of multiplicity. In that, don't two beings exist within the same body for a length of time?
That said, I could easily write out a long essay on how the Exorcist is an example of how society expects Multiples to become Singlets again. But just because I've done so, doesn't make the source material a metaphor for anything.

--A

Date: 2006-08-24 04:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
I'm sure I've read a post on this community where the writer said one of her headmates was a demon. Do demons not count?

I'm not talking about metaphors, or social statements, or any sort of literary thing like that. If you write about two or more people who live in the same head, you are by definition writing about multiplicity. "The Exorcist" is divergent enough from the usual multiple experience (and most people's beliefs about real multiplicity) that I doubt anyone would ever connect to it emotionally that way, but two people in one body is two people in one body. And Roxas and his other certainly [i]are[/i] close to reality (at least, my system) to create sympathy. In other words, Roxas& isn't just a multiple, he's a well done multiple.

Date: 2006-08-24 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cirape.livejournal.com
Wassa 'sympathetic multiple,' anyway?

--Dizzy

Date: 2006-08-24 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mirrorbrothers.livejournal.com
"Sympathetic" in this context means "portrayed in a way so that the reader/audience/player/whatever will like them." Basically, "good guys." As opposed to the multiple in the Psych episode, who was a crazy dysfunctional murderous bad guy. In reference to multiplicity, a sympathetic portrayal would probably also have to not be actively hostile to the condition of being multiple itself - a movie about a system of good guys all crippled by their "illness" and integrating at the end wouldn't count.

Perhaps confusingly, in my last post I used "sympathy" in a slightly different sense, meaning "feelings of empathy or similarity." I probably should have picked a different word.

re: Psych "multiple" episone ("ghost")

Date: 2006-09-03 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] justbetsy.livejournal.com
that episode had LOTS of problems, I'm suprised the trans-gender community isn't up in arms for one, but then the whole series is a slapstick spoof
It's ALL stereotypes (it's on USA network) and politically incorrect jokes.

Profile

multiplicity_archives: (Default)
Archives of the Livejournal Multiplicity Community

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 12th, 2026 06:18 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios