Review of Psych Episode.
Aug. 21st, 2006 05:22 pmDunno how much good this review will do, as I didn't pay attention during most of the episode, but there was an episode of Psych that featured a male multiple. The portrayal was kinda bad. Kept up stereotype of "no-one knows anything about each other", and the infamous Male=Criminal stereotype. The system in question had three selves. The boring host, the woman named Regina and a possible soulbond named Martin Brody. The system was preparing to undergo gender reassignment surgery, and of course, one self killed the doctor another was seeing about it. The fake psychic this show is about figures it all out, and it ends with the multiple in the company of the Nice Men in White CoatsTM. Poor portrayal. Kept one system member laughing all night. So, without further ado, discuss.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-21 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 03:37 am (UTC)~Chai
no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-22 12:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 01:06 am (UTC)Because that's all it is.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 01:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 02:26 am (UTC)That's how TV works. It's why dead little white blonde girls in football shirts get the front page, whereas a middle age average working class murdered man gets a short mention somewhere around page 7.
~us
no subject
Date: 2006-08-23 04:52 am (UTC)It isn't that writers won't write sympathetic multiple characters. I am certain that they have done so. The problem is that no producer or studio will touch it.
For one thing, NAMI would have to approve the script, and they would leave their sticky fingerprints all over it. Remember what they did to Ron Howard over A Beautiful Mind? He was forced to insert a line into the script saying that John Nash had been "put on a new medication". Far be it from NAMI to permit the truth, which is that Nash taught himself to discern and ignore hallucinations, and taught his son to do the same.
Review for Pavilion.
Date: 2006-08-23 09:04 pm (UTC)Pros:
1. Male multiple. That means that they didn't make it a Sybil-type.
2. Cross-gender selves.
Cons:
1. Male multiple commits crimes.
2. Regina came across as a stereotyped female-in-male body.
3. The ending with the multiple in a mental institution.
Overall? Out of 10 I would give the portrayal a 3.
How's that for a review?
Alan Christian^Crew.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 01:45 am (UTC)--A
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:06 am (UTC)Re: Review for Pavilion.
Date: 2006-08-24 02:06 am (UTC)Geez, what a bunch of s--t.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:09 am (UTC)--A
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:30 am (UTC)Like I said, it's subtle. It took me a while to make the connection, and I couldn't tell you if the writers knew they were writing about something real. But it was similar enough to Johnny and me to touch a nerve.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:38 am (UTC)Its a common occurance that when you want to see something hard enought, you'll see it. You want to see Roxas as an example as a healthy multiple? Or perhaps you just wanted to see an example somewhere.
From a literary standpoint, the duality of man has been used over and over again. Pointing out Roxas and his Other as that is far more likely. And one does not need to have more than one person in their head to have more than one side to them.
If you /have/ to see Roxas and his Other as a multiple system, they're far from healthy at the end either. There's that whole integration thing again.
I think any signs of multiplicity in Kingdom Hearts are only from the player using their own experances to color the game.
|Which might be part of the experiance...I guess.|
--A
|And Diz|
Re: Review for Pavilion.
Date: 2006-08-24 02:45 am (UTC)thank you.
*headdesk*
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:00 am (UTC)Its really stretching to see us as a metaphor for multiples.
--A
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:10 am (UTC)Two, they're two distinct people in the same body. I don't see how you can argue with that. They have separate friends, and distinct memories, and different skills. They have dialogue at one point. It's more than can be explained away as a metaphor about the duality of man.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 03:40 am (UTC)There's little argument that the two share a body at the end, for however long it lasts. The game does not stand as an example as multiplicity. If you want to write that correlation, you might as well state that 'The Exorcist' is an example of multiplicity. In that, don't two beings exist within the same body for a length of time?
That said, I could easily write out a long essay on how the Exorcist is an example of how society expects Multiples to become Singlets again. But just because I've done so, doesn't make the source material a metaphor for anything.
--A
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 04:17 am (UTC)I'm not talking about metaphors, or social statements, or any sort of literary thing like that. If you write about two or more people who live in the same head, you are by definition writing about multiplicity. "The Exorcist" is divergent enough from the usual multiple experience (and most people's beliefs about real multiplicity) that I doubt anyone would ever connect to it emotionally that way, but two people in one body is two people in one body. And Roxas and his other certainly [i]are[/i] close to reality (at least, my system) to create sympathy. In other words, Roxas& isn't just a multiple, he's a well done multiple.
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 04:00 pm (UTC)--Dizzy
no subject
Date: 2006-08-24 06:15 pm (UTC)Perhaps confusingly, in my last post I used "sympathy" in a slightly different sense, meaning "feelings of empathy or similarity." I probably should have picked a different word.
re: Psych "multiple" episone ("ghost")
Date: 2006-09-03 04:44 pm (UTC)It's ALL stereotypes (it's on USA network) and politically incorrect jokes.