Date: 2005-10-04 09:14 pm (UTC)
1.
it sounds very sketchy, and I wouldn't neccessarily believe it. It reminds me of a horror story from the most functional system i know irl. their ex apparently figured out their thing, and apparently figured out how to 'hypnotically suggest' stuff, as well as to work them against each other. among other things, was able to cause them to think they walked out of a courtroom with a restraining order, only to discover later that they actually cancelled the application progress.

also, just because you love someone, and trust them, and beleive they are a good person, doesn't mean they are, and its mature and responsible of your to maintain your personal boundaries. and if this person IS trustworthy etc, they will respect those boundaries, period. but they can't easily respect a boundary that you don't set. personally, i'd be wary of giving permission to do that, especially if your systems communication is shakey at all.

4.
we're pretty sure that you can't really understand being a multiple unless you've been/are one. someone can try, and thats appreciated. and some can get rather close. we appreciate it when people try. we don't understand what its like to be short, nor to be epilectic, nor to be a chipmunk, and we likely never will. understanding is good as far as it is possible, but respect is what its about imo.

7. nope.
Anyone in the Seattle area? :D


-Tia
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

multiplicity_archives: (Default)
Archives of the Livejournal Multiplicity Community

March 2013

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17 181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 24th, 2025 06:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios