I've been thinking about this a bit (but avioding the drama). Obvuisly systems like us wher we are all dyslexic and dyspraxic and autisric will have non-standard langage acquisiton and i guess some people from like otherwise neuro-tpical systems might be dyslexic or autistic or whatever so they would be non-standard too. I think all of us in this system do type age-approately for us but i think to some outside people it might look like we were trying too hard to be "little" or "wierd" or something. Anyway the main think i was wondering is - do you or anyone else know whether/how childrens wrting is different when they are typeing instead of wrting by hand. A lot of people have said stuff about double letters and it seems to us that missing or adding double leters is often a typing mistake that a person would prolly not make if they were writing by hand. And i wondered who much that knd of thing had been studyed.
what about typing? And non-standard people?
Date: 2005-07-01 12:58 pm (UTC)Obvuisly systems like us wher we are all dyslexic and dyspraxic and autisric will have non-standard langage acquisiton and i guess some people from like otherwise neuro-tpical systems might be dyslexic or autistic or whatever so they would be non-standard too.
I think all of us in this system do type age-approately for us but i think to some outside people it might look like we were trying too hard to be "little" or "wierd" or something.
Anyway the main think i was wondering is - do you or anyone else know whether/how childrens wrting is different when they are typeing instead of wrting by hand. A lot of people have said stuff about double letters and it seems to us that missing or adding double leters is often a typing mistake that a person would prolly not make if they were writing by hand. And i wondered who much that knd of thing had been studyed.