Random Research: Optic Noise
Apr. 11th, 2005 09:57 pmI've recently found that the relatively high levels of visual static we see don't seem to be a standard part of the human experience. It's potentially getting into the realm of Weird Neurological Stuff, for which very little information is to be had. This survey is an attempt pin down whether it's related to any of the other unusual states of being we might be part of, or refute the idea that it's not human standard.
The experiment:
I. Go into a brightly lit area with a sheet of white paper (blank on both sides).
II. Hold the paper in front of you, in a shadow, and note the level of visual static you notice.
III. Then, stand so the paper is well lit, and note any differences in the amount of static (absolute and relative, if it matters in your case)
IV. Next, stand so the page is in shadow again. Take note of any differences in the level of static.
V. If possible, go someplace very dark and note the level of static. If you can see the sheet of paper, it's probably not dark enough. :)
Demographics:
1. Are you multiple? Do you have Aspergers' or autism? Do you have ADD?
1a. Do results for the static test differ depending on who's fronting?
2. Have you ever had a concussion? More than one?
3. Have you ever used a substance known to cause hallucinations and/or related flashbacks? (This includes accidentally overdosing on cough syrup. Not sure how many answers I'll get, but figured I'd ask anyway.)
3a. If yes, did you notice a difference in levels of static before and afterwards?
4. Do you have a personal or family history of depression or related conditions?
5. Do you think banana slugs are neat? (Because I can.)
6. What's your MBTI type?
All questions are optional. Feel free to reply as anonymous, but please don't deliberately skew the results.
X-posted from here to Xibalba and back.
The experiment:
I. Go into a brightly lit area with a sheet of white paper (blank on both sides).
II. Hold the paper in front of you, in a shadow, and note the level of visual static you notice.
III. Then, stand so the paper is well lit, and note any differences in the amount of static (absolute and relative, if it matters in your case)
IV. Next, stand so the page is in shadow again. Take note of any differences in the level of static.
V. If possible, go someplace very dark and note the level of static. If you can see the sheet of paper, it's probably not dark enough. :)
Demographics:
1. Are you multiple? Do you have Aspergers' or autism? Do you have ADD?
1a. Do results for the static test differ depending on who's fronting?
2. Have you ever had a concussion? More than one?
3. Have you ever used a substance known to cause hallucinations and/or related flashbacks? (This includes accidentally overdosing on cough syrup. Not sure how many answers I'll get, but figured I'd ask anyway.)
3a. If yes, did you notice a difference in levels of static before and afterwards?
4. Do you have a personal or family history of depression or related conditions?
5. Do you think banana slugs are neat? (Because I can.)
6. What's your MBTI type?
All questions are optional. Feel free to reply as anonymous, but please don't deliberately skew the results.
X-posted from here to Xibalba and back.
My responses:
Date: 2005-04-12 02:18 am (UTC)III. Less than usual (drowned out by bright light).
IV. Typical.
V. Strong (walking around in the dark is difficult - all the static gets in the way, and there's nothing to distract from it).
In general, it's like viewing the world as a slightly snowy TV screen. Relatively flat/textureless surfaces, in dim lighting, will bring it out best.
1. Multiple. ADD: Not sure. Aspergers': Not sure. Autism: No.
1a. No.
2. Not that I know of. No history of head injuries that I'm aware of.
3. No. (Probably not for the cough syrup, too.)
4. Yes, both, depression.
5. Of course. :)
6. INTP (Introverted iNtuitive Thinking Perciever)
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 03:27 am (UTC)1. Multiple. No to the rest, including 1a.
2. Not that I know of.
3. No
4. Bipolar disorder runs in my family
5. Very much so.
6. INFP
And a question out of curiousity, why are you asking this?
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 02:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 04:04 am (UTC)III none (maybe a little)
IV none
V lots
1. multiple
1a. only ones tried
2. many
3. yes.
3a. don't know
4. personal depression
5. banana slugs RULE! (but i find them rather messy)
6.ENFP
Tia of changelyng
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 01:32 am (UTC)Also: http://p210.ezboard.com/fthosewithvisualsnowfrm1 (courtesy of
no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 06:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-12 09:37 pm (UTC)We've been told floaters are more comen/more commenly noticed in short sighted people and we know from experence how much you notice them depends onn loghting ans other enviromnetal stuff. Lattice degenration usually happens in short sihgted people and is norammly harmless but it does put you at more risk of deteached retina
There is also a natural aging process called PVD when people will notice more floaters for a while becos the vitreous (eye goo) is comng away from your retina. It's noramll and usually harmless but in people with latticed degenatrion it can be a problem.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 01:29 am (UTC)The static is a bit like watching broadcast TV during a thunderstorm, or switching to a station that isn't in use. Snow. Except transparent - it's an overlay across my entire field of vision, pretty much all the time, though dim lighting and untextured surfaces make it most noticable. It's usually not in the way, except with extremely dim lighting or in the dark.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-14 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-21 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 12:45 am (UTC)Demographics:
1. Singular, no Asp, no Aut, no ADD.
2. No concussions or head injuries of any type.
3. No wierd substances.
4. Personal & family history of depression.
5. Banana slugs are joy. :)
6. INFP, according to the test.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-04-13 01:56 am (UTC)We do have a nasty case of Cogan's microcystic epithelial dystrophy, but it does not affect our visual field. Sunglasses and salt ointment keep it under control.
no subject
Date: 2005-04-15 09:45 pm (UTC)(far far away from my lettuce)
they're cool as long as they don't eat my stuff
no subject
Date: 2005-12-02 08:28 am (UTC)