(no subject)
Oct. 19th, 2004 10:30 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
It's people liek this that cause the world of multiples to never be seen for what it truly is
(btw, for those of you who don't know me (pretty much everyone) I'm a non-multiple whose SO is a member of a multiple system)
EDIT:
The purpose of me posting this was not to bash one specific person for their belief on how they should treat my SO. This is jsut the first example I've gotten that is in WRITING of the way so many people think that a few pamphlets, a couple documentaries, and maybe a book or two and they're geniuses on the topic. They're the ones who don't see that whether someone is faking the "disorder" or not, it is often a defense mechanism, not something for purely attention. Even if it IS for attention, maybe teh person believes that surrounding themselves with a large number of peopel on the outside will protect them.
(btw, for those of you who don't know me (pretty much everyone) I'm a non-multiple whose SO is a member of a multiple system)
EDIT:
The purpose of me posting this was not to bash one specific person for their belief on how they should treat my SO. This is jsut the first example I've gotten that is in WRITING of the way so many people think that a few pamphlets, a couple documentaries, and maybe a book or two and they're geniuses on the topic. They're the ones who don't see that whether someone is faking the "disorder" or not, it is often a defense mechanism, not something for purely attention. Even if it IS for attention, maybe teh person believes that surrounding themselves with a large number of peopel on the outside will protect them.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 07:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 07:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:06 pm (UTC)Dat
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:07 pm (UTC)Dat
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:08 pm (UTC)I agree with you. Spew.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:17 pm (UTC)Dat
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:26 pm (UTC)Dat
no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 10:14 pm (UTC)I'd like to bring to light what I feel to be the bottom line. It was something offered to me by one of our therapists. It dosn't matter who believes in the people who believe themselves to be multiples or who believes in multiplicity in general, just that we respect eachothers right to use any means including multiplicity to relate to the world and cope with it so long as we don't harm anyone.
He also taught me that normal is just a wash setting.
Smart guy. Cheers Ted.
Y'fandes Mae
of Krystale
Off topic
Date: 2004-10-19 10:16 pm (UTC)So does Eppi.
Re: Off topic
Date: 2004-10-19 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-19 11:16 pm (UTC)*falls over laughing* I absolutely *must* remember that one!! ty ever so much for that !
{J}tatiana
no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 01:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 03:09 am (UTC)In the original poster's defense... it is hard to be on the outside. The husband has had many conversations between Us that didn't mesh and odd facts that didn't match up.
Now, to redeem myself.
I think that his lack of decorum by bringing a post like that in here was just ignorant. His issue is with his SO (and sorry if it's female that posted, you get where I'm going either way), and if the question was "How can I tell if they're faking?' then that should have been the question asked. I think that because of the lack of info provided, that this person was also just looking to start a community arguement with the comment about inside communication.
The person really should just sit down with their SO and talk it out, and ask questions, rather than jump on a community board and throw accusations.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 04:30 am (UTC)The poster is part of a social group known as KAOS (its a university club sortof). It is full of (to put it politely) pseudo-intellectuals who take great pleasure in being extremely pedantic and skeptical of anything which remotely strikes them as "trendy and PC". Many people there take great delight in running down and viciously attacking anyone who does not conform to their particular accepted norms. It would be hard to find a group more riddled with backbitting, infighting and vicious rumour mongering.
Putting it bluntly, its fully of wankers and posers. The poster (and several others) fall into this group. Ignore them, they are trolling mainly for reaction.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 04:52 am (UTC)Gee, thanks, dude. And you guys are the ones complaining about people making assumptions and quick judgement, with lack of proper background information!
*Rolls eyes*
no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 04:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 05:09 am (UTC)To maybe help clear a few things up.
This has nothing to do with KAOS, other than the fact that a few people involved in it are from KAOS.
Dan did NOT post his entry to start a shit fight. It's his journal. He rants in it. He even posted a warning at the start.
I guess he just doesn't like hearing about Chris' multiplicity, (true or otherwise, I'm going to reserve comment) and having it shoved in his face at every given opportunity. A lot of things are that way. If it gets brought up FAR more than is necessary, and in such a way as it is, it looks like attention seeking. I'm not saying it is. I'm not saying it's reserved for this situation, because I _know_ it's not. I just don't like it when people come across as what seems like bragging about their mental/emotional troubles.
As for "It's people like this that cause the world of multiples to never be seen for what it truly is,"...well, it doesn't make sense. Nothing can be seen for what it is, it's seens for how it's seen. That's WHAT it is. I don't know if that makes any sense but...I think one of you made a comment along the lines of 'it doesn't matter what other people think, it's the system's belief that counts," or something? The same thing goes here. A lot of people don't believe in MPD. Great. That's life. Why is it a problem?
I'll probably think of more to say once I post this, but hey.
*shrugs*
no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 06:55 am (UTC)I did not accuse him of anything. It IS stuff liek that being said that when multiples finally start to get respect, dumps them back a dozen or so steps.
As for whether or not there's faking, I honestly don't give a damn. And I HAVE sat down with my SO and talked about this stuff.
I didn't mean for this to be the opinion of one person against the world: I've heard this "multiples are faking it" and "multiples don't actually exist" argument a lot in the last few years alone. Even if he IS specifically targetting one person, I'm not.
no subject
Date: 2004-10-20 07:20 am (UTC)People ask why it's so difficult for multiples to be seen as multiples isntead of just people seeking attention or schizophrenics, or hypochondriacs, or any of a wide range of things. Maybe that's why so many multiples are trying to put it out there that they are what they are. "bragging" as you put it.
People "brag" about their depression, their tendencies to attempt suicide, their hyperactivity disorders, their anxiety. That doesn't mean they're just trying to get attention. I have to inform everyone I work with not to stress me out too badly because I have anxiety issues. Some of them, I have to remind daily. Doesn't mean I'm bragging abotu it. I wish I didn't have to point it out at all, but for my health, both physical and mental, I have to. Perhaps a multiple has certain thigns that upset them. I'd rather be reminded daily that they are a multiple so I remember to miss certain subjects than to go hard and heavy into one of those subjects and have a breakdown on my hands.