I am not saying this is the case here, but I have often heard this argument used to dismiss both otherkin and multiples as merely being disaffectected head-jobs who either associate themselves too much with something or dissociate themselves to much from everything.
While this may be the case in some situations, I by no means think it is true in all, or even most instances of otherkin or multiplicity.
I'm not entirely sure whether you intend to imply that this is an applicable theory as to the causes of the two for everyone, but it almost sounds like it.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2004-10-16 08:55 am (UTC)While this may be the case in some situations, I by no means think it is true in all, or even most instances of otherkin or multiplicity.
I'm not entirely sure whether you intend to imply that this is an applicable theory as to the causes of the two for everyone, but it almost sounds like it.
If not, my apologies for misunderstanding.