When I wrote this, I meant that people who have got soulbonds that take the front could regard themselves in the same situation as a small multiple group and have system management to be responsible. Maybe it is not clearly worded enough.
I always thought that if you had soulbonds who didn't take the front, that was plain soulbonding; if your soulbonds did take the front, it was more like a small communicating multiple group. We used to say "a group whose members were soulbonded in".
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2005-08-30 05:53 am (UTC)http://www.karitas.net/pavilion/library/articles/s_sbsense_ast0802.html
When I wrote this, I meant that people who have got soulbonds that take the front could regard themselves in the same situation as a small multiple group and have system management to be responsible. Maybe it is not clearly worded enough.
I always thought that if you had soulbonds who didn't take the front, that was plain soulbonding; if your soulbonds did take the front, it was more like a small communicating multiple group. We used to say "a group whose members were soulbonded in".