He saying he isn't split off, or a part of a gestalt whole. He's saying he is his own gestalt whole. He's saying he isn't a subperson to a person, but a person himself.
You don't have to believe him, or delete anything, but try to understand what he and others have been communicating. This paragraph works for you, great. It doesn't work for him, or others, also great. You thought some people might find it relevant, and some might. It looks like at least one median has found it semi-relevant. There's no need to delete it.
You're missing the import of what he's saying
Date: 2005-08-18 09:17 pm (UTC)You don't have to believe him, or delete anything, but try to understand what he and others have been communicating. This paragraph works for you, great. It doesn't work for him, or others, also great. You thought some people might find it relevant, and some might. It looks like at least one median has found it semi-relevant. There's no need to delete it.
--Me