ext_145120 (
annabellelaw.livejournal.com) wrote in
multiplicity_archives2005-08-25 12:09 am
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
I'll probably take flack for this but...
I'm kind of two people sharing the same body. A division of mind, two personalities with some shared memories.
I read some posts in this community & go "Yes... that sounds familiar. I'm glad I'm not alone."
I read some posts and go "Riiight... nutter, nut-ter. Notjob"
This place occasionally makes me feel sane because I read things from literate inteligent people who just happen to be sharing a body with others. Occasionally it makes me feel sane because I read posts and realise that I'm a healty sane multiple, not insane like the poster.
I'll not single out any individuals (forgive the pun) but the nut-job posts I read usually ... heck. I'm not going to give examples. I think you know which ones I'm refering to.
I read some posts in this community & go "Yes... that sounds familiar. I'm glad I'm not alone."
I read some posts and go "Riiight... nutter, nut-ter. Notjob"
This place occasionally makes me feel sane because I read things from literate inteligent people who just happen to be sharing a body with others. Occasionally it makes me feel sane because I read posts and realise that I'm a healty sane multiple, not insane like the poster.
I'll not single out any individuals (forgive the pun) but the nut-job posts I read usually ... heck. I'm not going to give examples. I think you know which ones I'm refering to.
*eyes narrow*
... or whatever the fuck that quote is.
Re: *eyes narrow*
Re: *eyes narrow*
Re: *eyes narrow*
Re: *eyes narrow*
Re: *eyes narrow*
no subject
i probably sound so mean, but i can't always be nice.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Contrary to what our recent start of activity here would suggest, we've actually been lurking for about two years. Which is more than enough to give someone permanent indigestion.)
(no subject)
no subject
Bravo for close-minded people.
That was sarcasm, by the way.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no, seriously. everyone has their own definition of what they consider sane, so it's rather pointless to pick a fight about it. it's really nice and all that you can sort people out so easily, but what's your point? does it help those people to call them a nutter and not much else? how about... gasp... actually giving a shit that someone else is having a rough time and wants some actual, intelligent assistance? especially if you are so enlightened and stable yourself that you actually have advice to give? or are you too high above the loonies?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Ahh, context.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
*shrugs*
Re: *shrugs*
Re: *shrugs*
Re: *shrugs*
*shrugs*
(no subject)
hierarchical self esteem
Them's fightin' words!
Re: Them's fightin' words!
Re: Them's fightin' words!
Re: Them's fightin' words!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Re: hierarchical self esteem
Amazingly enough
For example, I have issues with people when they make posts of this sort, not because it's wrong per se, to have boundaries, but because more often than not, it's an attempt to avoid really looking at one's own behavior. Hence, this is why I am wary when someone declares themselves "sane" multiples, while simultaneously declaring others insane. I hope that's not the case here.
My personal preference, at current, is to offer advice when I think it's really needed, or asked for. Other than that, I don't know them from a hole in the wall. What I see, isn't actually what's going on. It's definately going to be colored by their ability to communicate clearly, and how receptive I feel to their communication.
Let's assume for a moment however that what I see, is actually what is going on. How likely am I to change their life? *shrugs* I'll make my opinions known, but honestly, what point is there in just calling someone crazy, instead of trying to explain why I don't think their method of handling the situation is the ideal one?
Then again, I'm not interested in the sanity badge, except for when necessary to protect my freedom. So perhaps the reason I don't see a point, is because I don't have an interest in proving that I am sane.
--Me
Re: Amazingly enough
Re: Amazingly enough
no subject
Maybe because we got exposed early on (age 13-14) to a glut of information describing the multiple experience as inevitably being one of sheer unlivable hell, it's a relief to us to see the shift towards relaxed acceptance. With such acceptance inevitably come groups who choose to run their systems in unusual ways or have 'quirky' (by general standards) self-definitions and ideas about themselves. I've had my share of 'oh, come on' moments with such people, but I've also had plenty of those moments with people in the MPD/DID model. The thing is, I've also reached the point where I'm more concerned about whether someone is getting along in the world at large, and able to cooperate with others, hold down a job, etc. to the best of their physical or neurological ability, than with whether I believe the things they say about their system or origins, or not.
It may be bullshit, but if that is the case, it is a kind I find much more tolerable than bullshit which involves pawning off all responsibility for living as a healthy group or person onto one's therapist.
There have always been, and will probably always be people playing at being multiple because they see it as a l33t kewl thing to do, or something that validates their suffering or their identity crisis, and I think some of the more extreme claims, especially those made casually, come from such people. Unfortunately, that's not something I can change. There are certainly times when I'll see a post and suspect that someone is bullshitting, or 'trying on' multiplicity as a new identity or phase the way some people go through a goth or pagan phase. It's the Internet, for crying out loud-- you can say you're anyone you want. Based on this alone, you naturally have to take everything with a little more salt than you would off-- I treat everyone at face value until proven wrong, but I always try to keep in the back of my head the possibility that they might not be what they say or appear.
My philosophy is that if the "weird thing" helps you live and be more functional in the world at large, go with it. You just might want to be careful about who you tell. I have always felt that it's a good policy to reveal information about yourself and your system in steps, based on how the other party has reacted to previous revelations. If you have unicorns in your system, you may not want to go sharing this fact with everybody. Not necessarily because they won't believe you, although you may also want to consider that factor, but because if you tell someone who thinks you're too nutty for your own good, you may find yourself forcibly pushed towards 'help' you don't want or need, and lose your rights if you resist. This, to me, is a much more pressing and dangerous concern than the possibility of being told 'oh, you're making that up.'
no subject
Some (note, some) of them just seem self-deluded, and that's fine; playing pretend is fun. I indulge in it too. (I'm not multiple, but I'm a fantasy writer. Can be similar. I have personalities and worlds in my head, but I put them there and I run, service and maintain them.) Where the imaginary stuff starts harming you - or causing you to harm yourself, however you look at it - then it's time to reel it in.
When I see a posting with all the hallmarks of Cliched Fluffbunny Multiple System - an obligatory TheDarkOne, for example, who cuts hirself - I just sort of roll my eyes heavenwards and bite my tongue.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Don't worry. I think people like you are insane. I'm glad all us nut jobs make you feel better sweety.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
We have no choice but to be what we are, internally. We cannot be anything else. We have some strange beliefs about who and what we are, true. However, in our daily lives we are functional, and capable of supporting ourselves. I am a firm believer in the idea that what is true for one person is not necessarily true for another. I can be called a nutjob, fine. However, I have taken flack from my own body's family every day I was open about my existence with them. My system has often wished to find someone who could understand. We have often dreamed of someone who could understand US. Yes, we have soulbonds of monster movie characters. However, other people have anime characters, and still others literature characters. The genre that appeals to a person who soulbonds the strongest is where their soulbonds come from, at least in our experience. I apologize for making you think, "Oh NOES! A NUTT3R! g0D sav3 us a121!" However, those are the identities of the Superhuman Crew.
And, we still function even with them. Ash1977Law and AnnabelleLaw, I ask only that you respect that my system believes what it believes. Call us nuts, call us freaks, if you wish, but just leave us alone in our delusions and insanity. That is all that we ask.
W.H.^Crew.