multiplicity_archives | (no subject)

Some questions, if I may:

1) I am confused as to the level of strong responses to my previous post containing the Hofstadter quote. Though I was expecting a lively discussion, there seemed to be a level of hostility or annoyance that I was not prepared for-- I may be mistaken, of course. In any case, was it the quote itself that aggravated people? Is quotes discouraged on this forum, or is only quotes directly pertaining to multiplicity alone allowed, and not quotes that may be indirectly related? Should I have stated my intentions concerning posting the quote in this community so as to have cleared up confusion before it began? Cata keeps claiming that we were being attacked somehow, but I find no firm, logical evidence of her assumption, and so would really like to get to the heart of the matter.

2) Though I have posted previously, albeit a while go, on the innerworkings of our system, it seems recent events and abilities within may have changed the appropriate identification of our processes-- at least for the purposes of such communities that require correct identification. We have always thought of ourselves as multiple/plural for two years, but the ability that's arisen where we integrate at will, and usually safely, to combine consciousness and skills, and then separate, may put us in the "median" category. I'd really like some feedback on the particular division with multiple and median.

3) My significant other, also a multiple, is stressed and alarmed that two of the entities within their system has walked out on them (let's call them the Elf-Star). A shaman-type woman claims that one of the entities that was once in the Elf-Star, which they just referred to as Phoenix, is now in her. Is that possible, that entities can walk out of one body and right into another?

Thanks for your patience.
-Stel of Hexpiritus

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I'm morbidly curious about who said that, and when. (Also is this the only nonsense they wrote or were they confused about other subjects as well? Some people spout so much [uh, blah-dee-blah, not-nice word] that it would be ridiculous to take their opinion on anything seriously. But I may be too optimistic there.)

- Teh Excessive Ego Demon aargghh I will eat your soul!

This was in an article that was up on line for a long time, about how the mental health system's belief in and perpetuation of the concept of multiple personality was a heresy. The idea was that by focusing on the abuse histories of people with multiple personalities, by sympathizing with them, helping them deal with abuse-related issues and integrating their personalities, doctors were encouraging these people to cultivate their already excessive egos. I can't find the article anymore, it was some Amen-Hallelujah thing.

Oh, and how about this:
MPD Is A Sin (http://www.nccg.org/deliverance/mpd/MPD03.html)

There's tons of... fertilizer out there.

Ok, wait, if the 'sinful' multiple system was integrated, how could they make a group decision to unintegrate?

Dealing with abuse issues cultivates the ego? I always thought that people who'd been abused generally had problems with self-image; or is it one of those 'suffering/pain is good for you' deals?

Amen on the fertilizer. Looks like that website spouts a lot of reli-sh*t on other subjects as well. (Which I suppose is comforting in a way.)

the hell did I just read? o.O

ugh I feel ill... :/

This isn't it, but it's very close:

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq82.html

This guy seems to link almost everything to narcissism, including autism.

And then there's always this:
http://www.psychoheresy-aware.org/mpd.html

Kai tried to find that earlier, but couldn't remember what it was called.