We found that all rather peculiar. While very respectful, the author still started from and reinforced the idea of 'this cannot be right/healthy/normal!' You notice the only choices we between (essentially) possession and past lives, no mention of the possibility of simply being multiple. That's what I really want - some mention, somewhere, by a singlet, that multiples can be multiple just because they are, and with no other explanation needed.
-Seb.