Kír says thank you; that that's exactly what he meant.
I can say this: there's many times when all three of us are solidly in agreement, and at such times we're still three distinct persons - as much as any three people in separate bodies would be. There's times we have to work out a compromise, like any three people in separate bodies. And there's times when compromise doesn't happen, so one, two, or all three of us don't get what we want, and we have to hash it out and make up later.... like any three people in separate bodies.
Yeah, I've got subroutines, subpersons, the traditional Id/Ego/Superego thing or the Transactional Analysis Child/Parent/Adult thing, or the Jungian Anima/Animus thing, and archetypes, literary muses, fictional characters of my own devising that sometimes do things I didn't expect... all that. But none of that has anything to do with my 'brothers', who've got 'all that' of their own.
Re: You're missing the import of what he's saying
I can say this: there's many times when all three of us are solidly in agreement, and at such times we're still three distinct persons - as much as any three people in separate bodies would be. There's times we have to work out a compromise, like any three people in separate bodies. And there's times when compromise doesn't happen, so one, two, or all three of us don't get what we want, and we have to hash it out and make up later.... like any three people in separate bodies.
Yeah, I've got subroutines, subpersons, the traditional Id/Ego/Superego thing or the Transactional Analysis Child/Parent/Adult thing, or the Jungian Anima/Animus thing, and archetypes, literary muses, fictional characters of my own devising that sometimes do things I didn't expect... all that. But none of that has anything to do with my 'brothers', who've got 'all that' of their own.