ext_21151 (![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
bacskocky.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
multiplicity_archives2004-10-19 10:30 pm
bacskocky.livejournal.com) wrote in multiplicity_archives2004-10-19 10:30 pm
Entry tags:
(no subject)
It's people liek this that cause the world of multiples to never be seen for what it truly is
(btw, for those of you who don't know me (pretty much everyone) I'm a non-multiple whose SO is a member of a multiple system)
EDIT:
The purpose of me posting this was not to bash one specific person for their belief on how they should treat my SO. This is jsut the first example I've gotten that is in WRITING of the way so many people think that a few pamphlets, a couple documentaries, and maybe a book or two and they're geniuses on the topic. They're the ones who don't see that whether someone is faking the "disorder" or not, it is often a defense mechanism, not something for purely attention. Even if it IS for attention, maybe teh person believes that surrounding themselves with a large number of peopel on the outside will protect them.
(btw, for those of you who don't know me (pretty much everyone) I'm a non-multiple whose SO is a member of a multiple system)
EDIT:
The purpose of me posting this was not to bash one specific person for their belief on how they should treat my SO. This is jsut the first example I've gotten that is in WRITING of the way so many people think that a few pamphlets, a couple documentaries, and maybe a book or two and they're geniuses on the topic. They're the ones who don't see that whether someone is faking the "disorder" or not, it is often a defense mechanism, not something for purely attention. Even if it IS for attention, maybe teh person believes that surrounding themselves with a large number of peopel on the outside will protect them.
no subject
Actually, no, it doesn't deny the possibility at all. It may be skeptical about the exsitence of such a condition, but I think saying that they deny any possibility is being just a little extreme.
"The fact that the psychiatric establishment is an instrument of repressive social control with a long history of perpetrating atrocities against the innocent..."
Uh. Conspiracy theorist? Over the top, for sure.
no subject
Do you not agree that the practices described are atrocities? There is certainly no doubt that they have been, and still are, perpetrated against hundreds of thousands of people.
Other books:
Bedlam: Greed, Profiteering, and Fraud in a Mental Health System Gone Crazy (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0312104219/002-6386061-5552016?v=glance) by Joe Sharkey
Toxic Psychiatry (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0312113668/ref=pd_ecc_rvi_2/002-6386061-5552016) by Peter Breggin, MD
The Manufacture of Madness (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0815604610/ref=cm_custrec_gl_acc/002-6386061-5552016?v=glance&s=books) by Thomas Szasz, MD
Other references:
Psychiatric drugs (http://www.breggin.com/)
Restraints (http://www.copaa.net/newstand/day1.html)
Electroshock (http://www.23nlpeople.com/ECT.htm)
Lobotomy (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=lobotomy+ice-pick&btnG=Search)
MKULTRA (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=MKULTRA&btnG=Search)
no subject
Shandra